Freedom of speech: We need you now

Freedom-of-SpeechRecently New Zealand Friends of Israel decided to sponsor two Israeli students who wanted to support the Canterbury Hebrew Congregation.  While they were here, we suggested that they share their personal stories about military ethics and fighting in the 2014 Gaza War.

Due to the limited time available we chose to organise public addresses at Canterbury University and Victoria University in Christchurch and Wellington respectively.

We initially approached the Students for Justice in Palestine in Christchurch and asked if they would like to host them. They said they were too small and would referred us to the University of Canterbury Political Science Society who would draw a much bigger audience.

Discussions were constructive and had reached an advanced stage with the University of Canterbury Political Science Society when suddenly their president withdrew from the project citing that it was unconstitutional to host speakers with any political bias.

Our speakers pointed out that they had hosted other speakers in the past from one side of the political divide or the other without the requirement for both sides to be represented at the same event in the past. Nonetheless we respected their decision but was saddened by the double standard that had been applied.

In Wellington we were able to make much more progress because the Australasian Union of Jewish Students has an active branch there and to their credit they had no hesitation in agreeing to host and organise the event.

Unfortunately another student group called Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) have begun  distributing flyers on campus and pressuring the University to deny access to its facilities for the event. They published a press release which was picked up by Scoop on Friday (http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1509/S00344/row-over-universities-hosting-israeli-defence-force-soldiers.htm).

SJP’s stance is an attack on the principles of freedom of speech, a university’s role in facilitating honest enquiry through discussion and debate, and a denial of the principles of natural justice because no one can speak up in defence of the accused if they prevail.

Since the controversy is now in the public arena, both New Zealand Friends of Israel and the Australasian Union of Jewish Students have both issued their own public statements. Both of these statements have been picked up by Scoop:  http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1509/S00363/palestinian-justice-advocates-deny-others-justice.htm and http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1509/S00356/palestinian-students-try-to-stifle-freedom-of-speech.htm.

Now a group of Victoria University academics have also joined SJP in calling for these students to be suppressed: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1509/S00361/academics-protest-idf-meeting-at-victoria.htm.

The Dominion Post (Fairfax , stuff.co.nz) has interviewed the academics.

Sean Plunket of Radio Live has interviewed these academics:    http://www.radiolive.co.nz/Israeli-soldiers-to-talk-at-Victoria-University/tabid/506/articleID/101259/Default.aspx.

TV3 (www.tv3.co.nz) has interviewed Naftali and Rafael and this will be aired on the 6pm news September 29. The

The Australian Union of Jewish Students has asked us to inform you that they are determined to protect the right to free speech on campus, they will  ensure this event will proceed but opposition is growing.

We invite you to show your support by:

  1. Quickly reviewing these items on Scoop and if they meet with your approval, click or tap the “like” button.
  2. Attend the meeting, show that freedom of speech, and the right to enquire about any topic, however controversial, at a University is something worth protecting.

Khazak ve’ematz (be strong and courageous)

Holocaust Remembrance Day 2015: The two questions

rivlin_rubi-UNPresident Reuven Rivlin’s Address to the UN General Assembly at the Ceremony for International Holocaust Remembrance Day, January 27 2015.

Your Excellency, Secretary General of the United Nations, Honorable members of the General Assembly, Your Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen.

I stand before you, at a time of great tension in our region. My heart and my thoughts, are with my people in Israel. Terrorism does not distinguish between blood. In this war, all of us, all the nations united, countries of the free world, must form a united front. Today we are marking the International Day of Commemoration in Memory of the Victims of the Holocaust. It is seventy years since the Red Army threw open the gates of the Auschwitz-Birkenau death camp. Now in its tenth year, this day was established in the calendar of the United Nations, at the initiative of the former Israeli Foreign Minister, Silvan Shalom, and each  year since then, this Assembly has marked this day with the commitment to preserve the memory of the Holocaust.

Paul Celan, the great Jewish poet of the 20th century, himself a prisoner in a Nazi work camp, once said, “Only in one’s mother tongue can one speak one’s own truth. In a foreign tongue, the poet lies.”  My friends, I am no poet, but I must agree, that there are truths, there are prayers, and there is pain, deep pain, that one can only express in one’s mother tongue. Therefore, on this important day, I have chosen to stand before you, and speak in the language of my mother, my father, in the ancient language of my forefathers, the same language that my grandchildren speak today.

This is the same language in which my fellow Jews cried “Shema Yisrael” Hear O’ Israel, as they were marched to the gas chambers. The language of my brothers and sisters, whose memory we honor today.

“Oh that my head was water, and my eyes a fountain of tears, that I might weep day and night for the slain of the daughter of my people!… For the mountains will I take up a weeping and wailing, and for the pastures of the wilderness a lamentation.”  [Jeremiah, chapters 8,9]

Ladies and Gentlemen. In 1915, when the members of the Armenian nation were being massacred, Avshalom Feinberg, a leading member of Nili, the Jewish underground which cooperated with the Allies during the First World War, wrote the following and I quote, “My teeth have been ground down with worry, whose turn is next? When I walked on the blessed and holy ground on my way up to Jerusalem, I asked myself if we are living in our modern era, in 1915, or in the days of Titus or Nebuchadnezzar? Did I, a Jew, forget that I am a Jew? I also asked myself if I have the right to weep ‘over the tragedy of my people’ only, and whether the Prophet Jeremiah did not shed tears of blood for the Armenians as well? ”

Avshalom Feinberg wrote that exactly one hundred years ago, one hundred years of hesitation and denial. But in the Land of Israel of that time, in the Jerusalem in which I was born, no one denied the massacre that had taken place. The residents of Jerusalem, my parents and the members of my family, saw the Armenian refugees arriving by the thousands – starving, piteous survivors of calamity. In Jerusalem they found shelter and their descendents continue to live there to this day.

There were two questions reverberating then, whose turn is it next? And will we Jews weep tears of blood for the tragedy of others too?

The first question was answered by history, some two decades later. The Jews were next. We, the members of my people, were next. In the valley of death of Europe it was the Jewish people who were the victims of a methodical, brutal, perverted and murderous extermination. Six million people, one third of my nation, about a million and a half of them children, were killed, slaughtered, suffocated, gassed to death, buried alive, burnt, massacred, died from hunger, from thirst, from disease, and other gruesome kinds of death, in the most horrifying crime ever committed in the history of the human race.

The answer to the second question asked by Feinberg. Truly, shall we weep, each one of us, only for our own nation’s tragedy, or shall we be able to cry also for the tragedies of others; for the tragedy of wounded children from Syria; for the tragedy of the young men and women from Europe, from the Middle East, from Africa and from Asia. This question still awaits an answer.

Ladies and Gentlemen. There has been no atrocity in the history of the human race to compare in its viciousness, its scope and its magnitude, with the Holocaust of the Jewish People. However, the slaughter of nations and of communities was not born in Nazi Germany and did not cease with the opening of the gates of Auschwitz-Birkenau, Majdanek and Buchenwald.

Now, in our own time, when the fundamentalist viper is raising its ugly head, we must remember that evil is not the property of any specific religion; just as it is not the attribute of any specific country or ethnic group. It is evil, that by its very nature, seeks to differentiate and discriminate between one life and another, between one human being and another, while the only real difference is between good and bad; between humanity and darkness.

For exactly that reason, those who regard Islam, Judaism, or Christianity, as enemies of the world are wrong and they mislead others. My father, Yosef Yoel Rivlin, of blessed memory, devoted his life to translating the Quran into Hebrew, believing in the importance of dialogue and the cultural significance of the Quran for all the children of Abraham. As my father’s son, I too believe implicitly that neither the West, nor the Christians nor the Jews are at war with Islam.

Right now, Islam encompasses, under its enormous wings, victims of persecution and of terrorism, while at the same time it also serves as the banner of the attackers. The victims consist of hundreds of thousands of Muslim men and women, together with Christians, Yazidis, Kurds and Druze, each one of them a helpless victim of vicious barbarity, of wicked terrorism that has nothing at all to do with the religion or with the words of the Prophet. It is our duty and our responsibility to fight without mercy against the attackers; just as it is our duty and our responsibility to protect all the victims.

Ladies and Gentlemen. The United Nations Organization arose on the basis of the great visions of peace of the prophets of Israel, “They shall beat their swords into plowshares”; it was established on the foundations of human solidarity and the values of humanism. But above all, this Assembly arose on the ruins left by that war of devastation, the Second World War.

This day, the International Day of Commemoration in Memory of the Victims of the Holocaust, is not just a gesture of memorial for the members of the Jewish people, the victims, or even the survivors. This day, this International Day of Commemoration, is not merely another memorial day on the UN’s annual calendar. This day – so I believe – is the most important day on that calendar. “Never again”, is not just a pledge by the survivors, and also not a pledge by the world only to the members of the Jewish People. “Never again” is, first and foremost, the very essence of this United Nations Organization, it is its mission, it is the primary and principal rationale for its existence.

Since the establishment of this organization following that world war that claimed so very many casualties, the UN has expanded and branched out. Today, its enterprises include economic and environmental development, preservation of heritage and the maintenance of peace. But despite all this, on this day, we once again remember the essence of the mission of this institution: all-out war against genocide.

To our great regret, since the UN was established – this rationale for its existence, its very raison d’être, has become ever more acute. Bosnia; Rwanda; Sudan; Cambodia; Syria; Nigeria. These are just a few of the places where nations and communities have been slaughtered in a way that reminded the world that the Holocaust of the Jews was not the final chapter in the brutal scheme of man against his fellow man. Each and every one of them were victims of genocide, even without wearing a yellow star.

As a Jew, as a Zionist, as an Israeli, as a human being, even though my hands are tied – my heart weeps together with those anonymous people marching to a mass grave. When we stand here today and declare,  “Never again”, we call out, never again racism and incitement; never again anti-Semitism; never again systematic rape and humiliation; never again concentration camps and torture; never again killing pits and mass graves, gas chambers and crematoria; never again – this is the task set before the gates of this Assembly. This is the mission laid before us.

Ladies and Gentlemen. On this day we must ask ourselves honestly, is our struggle, the struggle of this Assembly, against genocide, effective enough? Was it effective enough then in Bosnia? Was it effective in preventing the killing in Khojaly? Of Afghans by the Taliban? Is it effective enough today in Syria? Or in the face of the atrocities of Boko Haram in Nigeria? Are we shedding too many tears, and taking too little action?

I am afraid that the United Nations “Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide” that came into force as long as sixty-four years ago, has remained a merely symbolic document. It did not succeed in realizing its commitment and fulfilling the objective that underpins the establishment of the United Nations Organization. Therefore, this institution, where we are standing today, has a duty of unparalleled challenge not to make do with statements but rather to push ahead with decisive action.

The international community that is joined together in this organization bears the duty to lay down the red lines that define genocide – and to agree that the crossing of those red lines makes it compulsory to intervene. On the other hand, and in the same breath, we must remember that definition of the red lines requires putting an end to the devaluation and the cynical, supposedly objective usage in rhetoric on human rights of concepts such as “genocide”, for political purposes.

Thus, for years, this Assembly (whose resolution validated the establishment of the State of Israel) identified Zionism – the Jewish revival movement – with its greatest enemy, racism. That shameful UN resolution, number 3379 – has since been annulled. However, unfounded comparisons of that type, to which we, as Israelis, are constantly exposed (among them the attempt to make a link between Israel and genocide, and only recently, once again, with war crimes), not only do they confuse between partner and enemy; they also sabotage the ability of this Assembly to effectively fight the phenomenon of genocide.

My friends, at the end of the day, this Assembly too, like any political institution, is motivated by many different considerations and interests. Even if we agree on clear red lines – that is not enough. We must agree that in the fight against genocide – the humanitarian and moral consideration must take precedence over economic, political and other interests. As a member of the Jewish People, I stand here before you and say, nations cannot be saved and must not be saved ‘as an afterthought’, or from considerations of cost benefit.

Unless the moral fire burns within us, the lesson of the Holocaust will never be learned. Communities and nations will continue to be murdered, children, women, men and the elderly will continue to march to their death to the enlightened music of the ‘orchestra of death’, against the background of a cynical and apathetic world, and through no fault of their own. The oath of “never again” will remain hollow and defiled, and we, all of us, will remain forever – prisoners of the camps.

Ladies and Gentlemen, to the extent that we believe that the voice of justice has not been silenced; to the extent that we believe in the dream of a different, more compassionate human race; we have the duty, here, in this Assembly, to act together as a determined and unified international community, which does not yield to narrow and inappropriate interests. In the name of the members of my People, victims of the Holocaust; in the name of the hopeless, persecuted people; in the name of our children; we must remain silent no longer we must rise up and take action.

As I conclude, I would like to return to the words of the ancient and sorrowful Jewish Yizkor memorial prayer for victims of the Holocaust:  ‘Judge of the earth, please remember the rivers of blood shed like water, the blood of fathers and sons, the blood of mothers and their babies . . . The cry of “Shema Yisrael” called out by those taken to their death are not silenced; and may the moans of the tortured rise up to thy heavenly throne.’

May the memory of the victims of the Holocaust, and the memory of the persecuted and the tortured be engraved upon our hearts forever. May their souls be bound up in the bond of life. Amen.

 

 

NZFOI Public Statement on the Israel-Gaza Conflict July-August 2014

Gaza-RocketNZFOI’S PUBLIC STATEMENT ON THE ISRAEL-GAZA CONFLICT JULY-AUGUST 2014

AUGUST 5, 2014

New Zealand Friends of Israel (NZFOI) is horrified by the parade of wounded, dying or dead Palestinian women and children across our television screens since the beginning of the latest war in Gaza.

We are appalled  that the death of three Israeli teenagers and 1 Arab teenager should spiral so quickly into full blown war.  NZFOI is deeply concerned by reports that Hamas is illegally using civilians as human shields.

We are disturbed that Hamas has been storing munitions in UN schools and carrying out operations from within hospitals.  The suffering of civilians and the loss of their homes is heart rending.

On the other hand, the barrage of rockets indiscriminately being fired into Israel must be stopped.  Though relatively ineffective against Israel’s defences, they are nonetheless deadly if they are allowed to reach their intended targets.

We understand that Israel must do what it must to stop the barrage of rockets and to prevent terrorist incursions using underground tunnels to cross the border.

Urban warfare will result in civilian casualties and that the historical ratio of civilian to combatant casualties in all conflicts around the world since WW2 is near 3:1.  As yet we do not know what the final ratio might be in Gaza, but we urge everyone to be slow in jumping to conclusions.

In time of war, all news coming from a war zone can be and often is subject to censorship. Only pictures of civilian casualties are emerging from Hamas controlled Gaza.  All civilian deaths in Gaza are being attributed to Israel.

This is not the full picture.  This conflict is not just a war of physical violence but also a manipulative war for hearts and minds.

We are also sickened that pro-Palestinian rallies around the world have sparked many anti-Semitic acts.  Slogans rarely heard since Nazism held power, are being openly chanted.

Synagogues and Jewish stores have been attacked.  Jews have been beaten in the streets.  Jews once more are afraid of being seen in public.

The world has not learnt from the Holocaust.

Our thoughts and prayers are with all those who have been wounded or have suffered the loss of a loved one through this conflict. We pray that it will draw to a swift and peaceful conclusion.

ABOUT THE SOCIETY

NZFOI was formed in 1974.  It fights racial and ethnic intolerance by raising awareness of Jewish history and culture, www.nzfoi.org.

STATEMENT ENDS

Nov 2012: Self-defense?

Noam Chomsky

On November 20, 2012 Richard Thomas wrote in the The Press and quoted Noam Chomsky:

When Israelis in the occupied territories now claim that they have to defend themselves, they are defending themselves in the sense that any military occupier has to defend itself against the population they are crushing. You can’t defend yourself when you’re militarily occupying someone else’s land. That’s not defense. Call it what you like, it’s not defense.

NZFOI’s response was published in the Press on November 24:

Richard Thomas (Nov 20) quotes Noam Chomsky to say that Israel is only defending its occupied territories.  To many Palestinians all of Israel is occupied territory.  They do not recognize the UN declaration that founded the modern state of Israel.  Others will claim that its very existence is a grave wound to the world-wide Islamic community, the Ummah.  A wound that cannot be healed until Israel is destroyed.  The Middle Eastern conflict cannot be resolved unless these kinds of beliefs are changed.  Hamas’ attacks are not just aimed at the disputed territory where controversial settlements exist.  They are aimed at all Israeli communities within range of their rockets.  Israel is ultimately defending its right to exist.

 

Feb 2012: Why Jews object to the idea of a “Palestinian”

A recent thread of correspondence regarding the use of the term “Palestinian” began on February 15, 2012 in the Christchurch Press.  Here is the full thread followed by our response.

On February 11, Lois Griffith wrote:

Of course, Jesus’ religion when growing up was Judaism (8 Feb) This was after all before the founding of Islam or Christianity.  The point Rabbi Boteach should (and will not) make is that Jesus was a native of historic Palestine, i.e. a Palestinian.  Palestinians make the point that Jesus was an early Palestinian martyr, martyred by the occupying power of the time, ie, the Romans.

On February 13, David Zwartz wrote:

Lois Griffith’s assertion in her letter of February 11 that Jesus was an early Palestinian martyr shows that she lives in a make believe world that aims to rewrite history.

Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea (Matthew 2). 

Judaea was part of the historic land of Israel (Eretz Israel in Hebrew), the land of theJews from the 8th Century BC.

It was renamed Syria Palaestina by the Romans in 135 AD — about a hundred years after Jesus’ death — following the unsuccessful Jewish Bar-Kochba revolt. 

In no way could Jesus be a native of historic Palestine when it didn’t even exist in his day.

On February 15, Lois Griffith wrote:

 I didn’t quite get what Mister Zwartz is getting at in his attack on me, although I am aware that Zionists nearly choke on the word Palestinian (February 13).

The Palestinians are indigenous of the holy land, whose ancestors worked the land for generations while conquerors and rulers came and went.

Before the Zionist takeover, religion was not a source of division and exclusion.

If Jesus or his followers have descendants alive today in that part of the world, they would be Palestinians whether they practised any religion or none.

Palestinian Christians, speaking on behalf of all Palestinians, do not understand why many American evangelical Christian Zionists not only ignore their suffering but encourage and even help finance their oppressors.

Our response (submitted Feb 15 but not published):

Lois Griffith (Feb 15) is mystified because Jews object to the idea of a “Palestinian”. The reason is that it has been used to alienate them from their historic connection to the region.

It is symptomatic of a larger problem:  The rewriting of history to undermine Israel’s legitimacy. 

Thus Arabs become “the Palestinians”, implying that they are the only indigenous people in that region.  It wasn’t until 1967 that Arafat and the PLO re-invented the “Palestinians” as a distinct Arabic people.  Gazan and West Bank children are taught about Palestine as if such a state had existed forever.  Israel “occupies” a country that never previously existed. 

March 2011: Spies in New Zealand

There has been much media speculation about the possibility that Israel is carrying out espionage activities in New Zealand (see http://tinyurl.com/3tpvs5x)

Here is some useful background:

There were around 3,500 Israelis in NZ at the time, and no one knew how many of them were in Christchurch.

Immediately after the EQ, the Embassy issued a public directive to all Israeli citizens that if they were uninjured and had the means, they should leave Christchurch without delay.

Contrary to the report in the Press, the Israeli Ambassador to New Zealand is based in Wellington.

One of our members hosted the Israeli USAR team and we understood it to be sponsored by the two families who lost their sons together in the EQ.
The Israeli USAR team showed us videos of themselves working in Haiti and other disaster zones.

The third Israeli casualty, who died in the van and who allegedly had 5 passports in his possession was not the subject of the USAR team’s interest at all.

I spoke with a desperate parent for over an hour on an international toll call as we explored ways the Israeli USAR team could enter the Red Zone. If he was a Mossad agent trying it on, then he deserves an Academy Award. In the end, for a number of reasons, admission into the Red Zone was never granted.
Much is being read into Israelis leaving NZ hurriedly following the EQ. We were directly involved in the search for Israeli survivors in the aftermath of the EQ.

As part of that search we had to track down Israeli tourists who had been in Christchurch to see if they had sighted the ones we were looking for. Many were evacuated to the YWAM base in Oxford. Within days after the EQ nearly half of those Israelis had already left the country.

Furthermore, Christchurch has an international airport. Lots of tourists plan to end their holiday here and expect to depart NZ from here. The two Israelis Engel and Levy were only in Christchurch because they were expecting to leave NZ in the next few days. It was their last and unfortunately, final stop. So the fact that many had left the country so quickly is not unusual.

Rabbi Goldstein tells me that many of the EQ Israeli USAR team were also members of a USAR team that was out here and found Liat Okin’s body on the Routeburn Track back in 2008.

Many countries won’t allow entry to Israeli citizens but because of their cosmopolitan backgrounds they can be eligible for citizenship of more than one country so having multiple passports is not unusual.


Tony Kan,
President,
NZ Friends of Israel Association Inc

March 2011