Home » Archives for NZFOI » Page 90
→ 6 June 2017
→ By
→ Leave a Comment

Concessions are essential to win peace: Tragic legacy of the Six-Day War | Irish Examiner

In June 1967, Arab leaders decided to crush Israel, then the only democracy in that divided region.

The Six-Day War followed and Israel prevailed, but the legacy of that short, sharp act of self-preservation festers to this day. Sadly, a resolution to one of the greatest tragedies of our time seems as remote as it ever was, maybe even more so. There is hardly an issue that so polarises opinion. Even discussing it in public, as UCC discovered, brings difficulties. Israel’s propaganda machine constantly challenges the equally questionable culture of shared victimhood that underpins international support for the Palestinian cause, a culture that saw the Palestinian flag flown over Irish public buildings in recent weeks.

Read more: Concessions are essential to win peace: Tragic legacy of the Six-Day War | Irish Examiner

Filed Under: Opinion
→ 1 June 2017
→ By
→ Leave a Comment

ANZAC Campaign food – misery galore

We continue our series of articles as we mark the centenary of the ANZAC Palestine campaign in 1917:  This month, in the second of our series,  we give you a taste of what food was like on the NZ campaign.

The NZ Army Museum in Waiouru is currently hosting an exhibition called “Food, Glorious Food: An Army Marches on its Stomach” to enlighten Kiwis on the horrors of army food rations in the First World War. Sadly the Sinai Palestine campaign was no gourmet exception, rather it was quite the reverse. Our soldiers suffered disproportionately because of their isolation and location and the fact that they could not recuperate on normal rations during their leave periods.

Certainly, the Middle East campaign disrupted food supplies for locals and others and given the huge numbers of extra personnel involved. Even a limited variety of fresh fruit and vegetables were not readily available. Service personnel relied on their governments to send basic food supplies which were also supplemented by parcels from home. So despite having knowledge of prevention of diseases like scurvy, the NZ soldier’s condition was only going to deteriorate in the campaign from lack of calories, vitamins and minerals. This was all too real after the Jordan Valley phase in 1918 when the men lost fighting condition. Dietary restrictions and harsh conditions must have impacted on their long term health as well.

The basic diet comprised a small daily water bottle of fresh water, sometimes barely potable and a ration of porridge or rice, tinned greasy corned beef, a biscuit that resembles a large modern dog biscuit, a can of questionable condensed milk, marmalade, some tea and sugar and very little else. Camp rations weren’t much better. The biscuit was so hard many soldiers cracked or lost teeth trying to eat it. Rations were barely enough to cover the calorific requirements of active service. The monotony of the diet must have been demoralizing, but hunger would have driven them to eat almost anything. Additional army supplies included seasonal jams seasonal. A cherished fruitcake or gingernuts made with love would have provided welcome relief and an opportunity to share with your mates. Sometimes supplies were left in the sun and became too hot to handle or went off adding to the misery. The volume of flies drawn by the smell of food made eating a quick and stressful affair.

So you can imagine the joy our soldiers must have felt to arrive in Rishon Le Zion and see the orchards. The day after the battle the soldiers were given a famous Jaffa orange each. It must have been like heaven! Then in the next days they were able to sample the delicacies of the local wines both in Rishon and in Jaffa, all for medicinal purposes! Later on in the campaign they could purchase food like tomatoes and cucumbers from Jordan Valley locals to supplement army supplies.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:  Joanna Moss is a Wellington-based researcher and writer.  See the food exhibition at National Army Museum Waiouru until Nov 1917 & at Hamilton’s Waikato Museum “Sand in the Apricot Jam” 4 March -11 June.

Filed Under: Resources
→ 1 June 2017
→ By
→ Leave a Comment

Sand, sand and more sand

ANZACs in the Desert

We continue our series of articles as we mark the centenary of the ANZAC Palestine campaign in 1917:  In the first two parts of this series we explained how ANZAC troops came to be deployed to fight the Turks in the Sinai Palestine area.  In the third part, we gave you a taste of what food was like on the NZ campaign.

Following the Turk’s unsuccessful charge on the Suez in 1916, the Allied forces began their defence of the Suez Canal and the clearance of the Sinai Peninsula. This was to take them the rest of 1916 and into 1917 yet the distance covered was less than 200km.

It’s 180km from Port Said to Rafah, the border town between Sinai and Israel today. This distance is equivalent to driving from Auckland to the outskirts of Tauranga or from Christchurch to just south of Timaru.

In effect there were three enemies, the Turks supported by superior German aircraft, the 35,000 Bedouins who resided in Sinai and the desert conditions, the latter described by the men as the Chief Enemy.

Any one of them was capable of destroying life in a short span of time. Once the Suez Canal was behind them our troops encountered a horizon dominated by sand, sand and more sand. The conditions were vastly different to Gallipoli or anything else they had seen in their lives beforehand.

Coupled with limited appreciation of how long they would spend in the desert, it must have been a dismal sight. For the horses, it would be a baptism of sand and extreme hardship.

British Lieutenant General Sir Archibald Murray chose the trans Sinai route known as the King’s Highway (Dar El Sultani) a track not far in from the Mediterranean Sea identified by a telegraph cable, the only real marker.

Its coastal proximity meant soft sand that precluded conventional shipping of supplies requiring reliance on camels with lesser carrying capacity. It was slow going for the troops trudging through the soft sand.

However, the real reason for the slow progress was the building and defence of a train track and a water pipeline – the necessities of life.

The enemy knew they could defeat the Allies simply by denying them water and blowing up the wells. In order to survive some troops had to be based at camps near water as a protective measure, so their first destination was the Katia oasis 40 km east of the Canal and later the Romani and Etmaler wells. These desert oases comprised small patches of date palms and shrubs.

However, being near to the coast, the water was often salty and bitter, so not very potable. The engineers offered a vital service in verifying tracked down water sources, repairing wells, testing and designating water quality. Water brought in from outside was often treated Canal water.

Meanwhile the troops had to remain invisible from the air and hidden from Turkish scouts or Bedouin, who could give them away. They would divide up to be better concealed, but had to always remain within signal range for safety sake.

Consequently, much driving progress was made at night. As the horses were their only means of transport, they remained top priority and required many hours of daily care (feeding, watering and grooming) to maintain battle-ready condition. Digging trenches and patrolling were the top two occupations.

The ANZACs were met with a grim reality when they discovered the toll the Easter Katia Turkish raid had taken on their Yeomanry British counterparts. As the summer wore on the conditions in the daytime became unbearable and some of the men suffered from sunstroke and were hospitalised.

Getting them out of the desert would not have been easy. Survival hinged on managing the desert conditions both to live and to fight. At times, this included fogs, mirages, freezing conditions, of course the proverbial sandstorms and the famous Kamsin winds that dried everything.

Sometimes the water would arrive in drums too hot to drink, adding to the misery. As time went on the troops became very familiar with the desert and were able to navigate at night using only a compass.

Moonlight provided some terrain guidance, but could also work to their enemy’s advantage. The Turks were pushed back and Sinai was finally conquered in early January as the troops moved on into Gaza.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:  Joanna Moss is a Wellington-based researcher and writer. See the food exhibition at National Army Museum Waiouru until Nov 1917 & at Hamilton’s Waikato Museum “Sand in the Apricot Jam” 4 March -11 June.

Filed Under: Resources
→ 1 June 2017
→ By
→ Leave a Comment

Gaza – Victory Snatched By Poor Intel

Prisoners of War captured by the Turks after the First Battle of Gaza.

We continue our series of articles as we mark the centenary of the ANZAC Palestine campaign in 1917:  In the first three parts of this series we explained how ANZAC troops came to be deployed to fight the Turks in the Sinai Palestine area; we gave you a taste of what food was like on the NZ campaign and we discussed the climate and conditions met by the ANZACs.

By January 1917, Rafah had been captured and the Sinai was in British hands. It was time to press on northward towards Gaza.

The coastal railroad continued to supply troops with provisions and much needed water indicating a coastal campaign was preferable. The Anzac troops took the opportunity to get some rest before beginning the next phase in late February.

Khan Yunis was occupied by the ANZACs on 28th with very little resistance. The British command expected the Turks to retreat northward. Lloyd George was now PM and he wanted victory quickly to counter the stalemate on the Western Front.

Murray ordered the first Gazan offensive in late March taking the Turks by surprise. It was the best use of the mounted division and conducted under extreme cold and fog that camouflaged their position.

Once the Germans got wind of the attack they called for reinforcements. Time was of the essence. The ANZACs had to penetrate the fields to the north ringed by cacti hedges (3m high and 5m wide) with their bayonets and get the wells.

The Wellingtons made it into Gaza capturing the outer streets as did the Australians. Sadly Chetwode and Dobell were concerned about water and reinforcements and so ordered the troops to withdraw. It was to be a costly blunder.

The ANZAC leaders stood their ground waiting for confirmation in disbelief. It was a bitter blow to the troops and to their confidence in British leadership. When the error was discovered some troops were sent back only to be repelled. It was too late.

The second battle began on the 17th March, but by this time the Turks had reinforced in numbers and dug in expecting a major offensive on Gaza and the Gaza-Beersheva road. The EEF were no match for them. This time the campaign had to be largely infantry driven (British) with the mounteds playing a supporting role.

Overhead the German Taubs monitored enemy positions. The infantry losses were considerable and with little chance for advancement, a retreat was ordered. By the end the NZMR had four nights without sleep and suffered heavy losses of horses; who were attacked from the air. NZ casualties were 88.  The troops became more despondent. The potential for a Western Front type stalemate loomed.

Lieut Gen Murray; who had been based in Egypt, had declared a victory in the first battle to the Home Office with British media suggesting huge numbers of Turks defeated and little resistance.

It was far from the truth. Murray had failed again in the second battle. He was ordered back to England in June and subsequent promotions meant that Edward Chaytor, a New Zealander, would now command the ANZAC Mounted Division and William Meldrum the NZMR.

Things would be relatively quiet for six months until a workable plan could be hatched by the incoming General Allenby.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:  Joanna Moss is a Wellington-based researcher and writer.  See the food exhibition at National Army Museum Waiouru until Nov 2017 & at Hamilton’s Waikato Museum “Sand in the Apricot Jam” 4 March -11 June.

Filed Under: Resources
→ 26 May 2017
→ By
→ Leave a Comment

Trump pushes for Mideast peace, but avoids thorny details – World – NZ Herald News

JERUSALEM (AP)  President Donald Trump on Tuesday pushed for elusive peace between Israel and the Palestinians, calling on both sides to put aside the “pain and disagreements of the past.”

Trump met with both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas during his quick stop in the region. S

peaking at the Israel Museum, he declared both sides ready to move forward, though there were no tangible signs of the dormant peace process being revived.

“Palestinians are ready to reach for peace,” Trump said.  Turning to the prime minister, who joined him for the speech, Trump said, “Benjamin Netanyahu wants peace.”

The president notably avoided all of the thorny issues that have stymied peace efforts for decades. He did not way in Israeli settlements, the status of Jerusalem or even whether the U.S. would continue to insist on a two-state solution giving the Palestinians sovereign territory.

Read more: Trump pushes for Mideast peace, but avoids thorny details – World – NZ Herald News

Filed Under: News
→ 26 May 2017
→ By
→ Leave a Comment

The big read: Israeli occupation turns 50 – A Palestinian’s commute through Checkpoint 300 – World – NZ Herald News

Like Taweel, four of every five Palestinians have never known anything but the occupation – an evolving system by which the Israeli military and intelligence services exert control over 2.6 million Arabs in the West Bank, with one system for Palestinians, another for Israelis.

This summer, the Israelis will celebrate their near-miraculous victory in the 1967 war, when in just six days, they took all of Jerusalem and their armed forces crushed the Arab armies thrown against them.

On the other side, the Palestinians will mark a military occupation going on for so long that many Israelis barely seem to notice anymore, except the young soldiers sent to enforce it.Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu refers to it, when he speaks of it at all, as “the so-called occupation.”

Some of his fellow citizens say there is really no occupation, because all the Land of Israel was awarded to the Jews by God. Other Israelis argue that Gaza is no longer occupied, because Israel unilaterally withdrew from the coastal strip a decade ago.

Read more: The big read: Israeli occupation turns 50 – A Palestinian’s commute through Checkpoint 300 – World – NZ Herald News

Filed Under: News
→ 25 May 2017
→ By
→ Leave a Comment

Ynetnews News – Czech Parliament recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel

On Jerusalem Day, the Czech Republic Parliament approved the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel; Members of parliament call on the government to adopt the same position and stop payments to UNESCO.

Read more: Ynetnews News – Czech Parliament recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel

Filed Under: News
→ 14 May 2017
→ By
→ Leave a Comment

Damien Grant: Hysteria over Israel a stain on our nation | Stuff.co.nz

I’ve liked Gerry Brownlee ever since he flouted airport security. It’s inherently obvious that an overweight middle-aged Caucasian cabinet minister isn’t going to hijack a plane. He may have shellacked Christchurch but views differ on that.Still, I like him even more now he’s let slip his view on New Zealand’s shameful support of a UN resolution declaring Jewish building in the occupied territories illegal. Israel squeezes 8 million people on a sliver of land smaller than Waikato, most of which is desert. They need to build houses.The world’s obsession with Jews in general and Israel in particular is one of the many disheartening features of modern life.

Read more: Damien Grant: Hysteria over Israel a stain on our nation | Stuff.co.nz

Filed Under: Opinion
→ 13 May 2017
→ By
→ Leave a Comment

What the last Nuremberg prosecutor alive wants the world to know

  • Twenty-two SS officers responsible for the deaths of 1M+ people would never have been brought to justice were it not for Ben Ferencz.
  • The officers were part of units called Einsatzgruppen, or action groups. Their job was to follow the German army as it invaded the Soviet Union in 1941 and kill Communists, Gypsies and Jews.

Ferencz believes “war makes murderers out of otherwise decent people” and has spent his life working to deter war and war crimes.

It is not often you get the chance to meet a man who holds a place in history like Ben Ferencz.  He’s 97 years old, barely 5 feet tall, and he served as prosecutor of what’s been called the biggest murder trial ever. The courtroom was Nuremberg; the crime, genocide; the defendants, a group of German SS officers accused of committing the largest number of Nazi killings outside the concentration camps — more than a million men, women, and children shot down in their own towns and villages in cold blood.

Ferencz is the last Nuremberg prosecutor alive today. But he isn’t content just to be part of 20th century history — he believes he has something important to offer the world right now.

Read more.

Filed Under: News
→ 12 May 2017
→ By
→ Leave a Comment

BDS Suffers Another Defeat at University of California-Santa Barbara; Divestment Resolution Gets Zero Votes in Favor

Zero votes were cast in favor of a boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) resolution at the University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB) early Thursday morning following a marathon debate between pro- and anti-Israel activists.

Over 100 students signed up to speak for and against the Students for Justice in Palestine-backed (SJP) resolution at a meeting of the student government (AS) that ran from 6:30 pm local time Wednesday until 4:00 am on Thursday, according to campus paper the Daily Nexus.

Ultimately, 16 student representatives voted against the resolution, which was titled “Divest From Companies that Profit From Human Rights Violations in Palestine/Israel.” There were seven abstentions.

Read more.

Filed Under: News
« Previous Page
Next Page »