“We will never forget, but will not be captive to the past”

The Press 18 October 2023

Juliet Moses

Julian Moses is a spokesperson for the New Zealand Jewish Council.

“Hamas did not build a state, but a terrorist infrastructure to destroy one.”

Jews are an ancient people with a long collective memory. Embedded in the memory, alongside happier times, our massacres we have suffered – during this destruction of our two temples in Jerusalem by the Babylonians and Romans, the 1190 massacre at York Castle, the pogroms of the Russian Empi (which my family flew), the 1929 Hebron rights, the Nazis’ Kristallnacht 1938, Baghdad’s Farhud of 1941, the 1972 Munich Olympics, to name a few.

Now there is another messenger that we will carry with us. October 7, 2023.

On our joyous festival of some Torah, Hamas, the year-round-backed terrorist regime that rules Gaza, stage a mass coordinated terror attack on Israelis with thousands of rockets and infiltration by more than 1500 members.

More than 1400 Israelis were murdered (proportionately in New Zealand, that would be about 770 people) and thousands hospitalised. More than 190 hospitals remained in Gaza. It was the deadliest day for us since the Holocaust.

As President Biden said: “this attack is brought to the surface painful memories and the scars left by millennia of anti-Semitism and genocide of the Jewish people.”

The barbarity, gleefully broadcast to the world, is unspeakable. Literally. Hardened war correspondence and soldiers at the scene had been rendered speechless, crying and retching.

There were raped women paraded through Gaza like trophies, Holocaust survivors and children taken hostage in Taunton, babies burned in the cops, families riddled with bullets while in hiding, a woman’s execution uploaded onto Facebook for her granddaughter to discover, 260 revellers at a music festival – peace – slaughter, shot in the back and safely and dismembered by grenades as they had in a bomb shelter.

The victims included Arabs (who comprise 20% of Israel’s citizens) and many other nationalities. Elderly peace activist Vivian Silva, who drove cancer-stricken Gazans to Jerusalem for treatment, is presumed adducted.

It leaves an indelible bloodied stain on the frame fabric of humanity.

Our pain and read are soothed by the many Kiwis who have expressed their horror and supported us, and compounded by those who not even allowed us the dignity and time to mourn.

While the death squads still stalled their prey through Israel and we were desperately missed during our family and friends need to check on them, the celebrations, justifications, equivocation, sanitisations and contextualisations began.

In New Zealand came from politicians, academics, columnists, a formal all-black, and (I will limit the word “civil”) society groups.

In declaiming about decolonisation, liberation, power imbalances, resistance and justice, they had to history’s long list of codewords like Christ-killers, poisoning the wells, Usery, and racial purity, that legitimise the dehumanisation and massacre of Jews. Yet, it is they who have lost their humanity.

Thousands marched in Auckland on Saturday, shutting the Hamas rallying cry “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” demanding the annihilation of Israel, where almost half the world’s Jewish population of some 15 million lives. We do not feel safe.

There was also the silence, including from those we believe to be friends, record the words of Martin Luther King Jr.: “In the end, we remember not the words of our enemies, the silence of our friends.”

As a moral duty of anyone who cares about the Palestinian people and wants peace to unequivocally condemn these atrocities, demand the release of hostages and reject the insidious inversion of morality in reality being propagated.

That inversion will talk about occupation and blockades, but omit to mention that Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, dismantling every settlement and removing every two (including those buried there).

It created the conditions for Palestinians to self-government for the first time in history, to be free and flourish, and coexist peacefully with the neighbours.

Instead, they elected Hamas, an internationally designated terrorist regime, after which both Israel and Egypt imposed military blockades to defend their borders.

Hamas did not build a state, but a terrorist infrastructure to destroy one.

Hamas does not want, and violently derails, peace – except that which the founder of Palestinian nationalism, Yasser Arafat, envisaged when he said, “peace for us means the destruction of Israel.”

Actually, can be no peace without the destruction of the genocidal ideology of Hamas. Enshrined in Hamas’ founding document as the unambiguous injunction to both obliterate Israel and Jews.

Hamas knows that, unlike itself, as well sees its first duty is protecting its people. Hamas launched this attack – for terrorism, not territory – understanding is people, who had two holes hostage, would pay a terrible price.

What would you demand of our government if there were an army of over 30,000 Isis-like terrorists and our border, willing and able to continue their genocidal mission?

In the meantime, Jewish people will do what we have always done. We will outlast Hamas, as with all our enemies who have sought our destruction through our civilisation.

We will never forget, but will not be captive to the past. We want to smear for all innocent lives lost. And to all those who on our right to self-determination, freedom and dignity, we will honour the same in return and continue to out stretch our arms in peace.

Israel at 75 | NZFOI

This is the speech given by Tony Kan, President of NZ Friends of Israel Association Inc at the Israel at 75 commemorative lunch held in Christchurch on April 30, 2023.

Mr Ambassador, Shmuel and the other members the Board of Management of the Canterbury Hebrew Congregation, to the committee members of NZ Friends of Israel, to the members of the NZ Friends of Israel and other supporters of Israel, on behalf of the New Zealand Friends of Israel, welcome.

One of the earliest records of New Zealand’s support for the Jewish people is recorded in a speech before the House of Parliament by Sir George Grey, in 1891, who said:

“…that New Zealand take for the first time a place amongst the nations of the world, in moving a question which is of common interest to all mankind, and formally recognize that it is the duty of the New Zealand nation, however small or however great it may be, to do all the good it possibly can for people in all parts of the world.”

He then placed before the House a motion:

“That a memorial be addressed to His Imperial Majesty of All the Russias, respectfully praying that all exceptional and restrictive laws which afflict His Jewish subjects may be repealed, and that equal rights with those enjoyed by the rest of His Majesty’s subjects may be conferred upon them.  That the said memorial be signed by the Speaker, and be by him transmitted to his Majesty.”

Zionism, which is the movement for the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, was supported by many countries in the early part of the 20th century, including New Zealand.

One of the ways in which New Zealand supported Zionism was by endorsing the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which expressed the British government’s support for the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine. New Zealand was one of the countries that voted in favor of the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine in 1922, which gave Britain the responsibility of administering the territory and preparing it for self-government.

Peter Fraser, who served as the Prime Minister of New Zealand from 1940 to 1949, was a supporter of the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine.

Figure 1  Sir Peter Fraser

Fraser had extensive contacts with New Zealand’s Jewish community and local and visiting Zionists.  Like Savage, he was a close friend of the Jewish brewer, Ernest Davies.  He attended a reception given by the Auckland Jewish community for David Ben-Gurion in January 1941 when Ben-Gurion was returning to Palestine after an unsuccessful attempt to arouse American Jewish opposition to the 1939 White Paper.  When the Zionist Federation of New Zealand held its first Dominion Conference in Wellington in 1943, Fraser delivered an understanding and thoughtful address.

In addressing the United Nations delegates at the San Francisco Conference in April 1945, Fraser asserted that:

“Whatever can be done to help the persecuted Jewish people shall and must be done to the utmost ability of all right-thinking men…

There should be no antagonism or misunderstanding between the Jewish and Arab peoples, everyone living in Palestine would naturally benefit from what the Jewish people have made out of a land which was once desert, until the desert bloomed as a rose. Palestine is very akin to the ideals of New Zealand except that the Jewish people went into Palestine with a tradition of privation…

…I hope and believe that the representatives from this country who take part in the counsels stand foursquare for justice for the ancient home and new hope of the Jewish people.”

New Zealand supported the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, and eventually voted in favor of the UN partition plan that called for the creation of separate Jewish and Arab states in Palestine.

Yizthak Triester reports that: Yet before the vote, the New Zealand Prime Minster was torn:  He wanted the United Nations to succeed as an international body. He wanted Britain to be allowed to withdraw from Palestine. But he knew that without an international military presence, the Partition Plan would lead to war. He voiced his concerns to Carl Berendsen, New Zealand’s delegate to the United Nations.

Figure 2  Sir Carl Berendsen

By November 21, Fraser had made up his mind. He told the British Secretary of State that, “We must support partition as the solution which offers the best possible hope, however small, of dealing with the situation as it exists at the present time.”

However, Berendsen continued pushing the UN to delay the vote until a better solution was found, preferably with the United States committing to send soldiers to the region to enforce the decision.

Figure 3  Chaim Weizmann

On November 22, Chaim Weizmann, who would become Israel’s first president, sent a telegram to Fraser, stressing that if New Zealand abstained from the committee vote on partition, “through doubt on certain issues,” New Zealand would prejudice the only chance for a decision.

As the deadline for the vote approached, Fraser replied to Weizmann that partition without enforcement was, “futile and seems calculated to lead to bloodshed and chaos.”

Isaac Gotlieb counted Berendsen as a friend and neighbour, though they did not see eye to eye on the issues of Judaism or Zionism. And Carl had his doubts about the partition plan.

By now, Fraser realized that without New Zealand’s vote, the Partition Plan may not receive the necessary two thirds majority. Although he feared the plan was flawed, he knew there was no alternative. So, before the vote, he went to discuss his options with Isaac Gottlieb.

Figure 4  Isaac Gottlieb

Isaac Gotlieb was a passionate Zionist. In 1943, he became the first head of the New Zealand Zionist Federation. He traveled the country raising money for the Zionist cause, and in 1946, he represented New Zealand at the first World Zionist Convention in Basel.

Isaac Gotlieb was born in Latvia in 1891 and emigrated to NZ in 1909, having completed his apprenticeship as a carpenter in Wales, and after a few years, in 1924 at the age of 33 opened his own company called The Art Cabinet Co.

He became a very successful businessman. During the depression years, while others went bankrupt, Isaac and his brother Morris flourished.

He mixed in social circles that included Fraser, and other government officials. When the prime minister and his colleagues came to visit my great uncle on just before the partition vote, he employed every argument he had to convince them that they should support it.  It worked.

In a speech to the New Zealand Parliament on 27 November 1947, Fraser stated his government’s support for the partition plan, which proposed the creation of separate Jewish and Arab states in Palestine.

In his speech, Fraser said,

“It is the solemn duty of the General Assembly to create a free and independent state of Israel, and to guarantee it a secure existence in the world. This is an act of justice that we owe to the Jewish people, who have suffered so much in recent years. At the same time, we recognize the rights of the Arab people, and we hope that the two states will live side by side in peace and friendship.”

On 29 November 1947, New Zealand was one of the 33 countries that voted in favour of the partition plan, while 13 countries voted against it and 10 abstained. New Zealand’s support for the partition plan was based on its belief that the Jewish people had a legitimate claim to a homeland in Palestine, and that the partition plan was a fair and practical solution to the conflict between Jews and Arabs in the region.

After the establishment of Israel in 1948, New Zealand was one of the first countries to recognize its independence. New Zealand also provided military and other forms of support to Israel in its early years, including sending a small contingent of troops to serve with the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO) in the region.

75 years later, Fraser’s hopes for Israel have been realised.  Today, Israel’s economy is a source of regional employment and wealth.  With the Abrahamic Accords, regional peace is another step closer.  And if further peace can be given a chance and maintained, then the economic windfall for all concerned, not just Jews, would be astronomical. 

Today, Mr Ambassador, New Zealand continues to stand with Israel, affirming its right to exist, and working with Israel to ensure peace prevails, so that all may live and become anything they lawfully aspire to be.

In the desert, the Rose is blooming.

Thank you for your attention.

FAREWELL

Folks, thanks again for taking the time to come out and share in this special occasion. 

Please do take home a balloon or two as a momento.

Before you go, I’d like to thank you, Shmuel, member of the Board of Management of the Canterbury Hebrew Congregation, for all your help in getting this event going.  I’d also like to thank Rebecca Marchand, our secretary for ably organizing the ticket sales and communicating with ticketholders, to Yoko Allan, David Allan, Alison Clarke and John Clarke for all their work in scouting out the venue and for handling the decorations.  I’d also like to thank you all for your support, without which this event would not be possible.

And of course, I’d like to thank the Ambassador himself for making the time to come, for sponsoring the event, and for the Israel-NZ badges, which may be obtained from Sarah, over there.

The Torah Prophet, Zechariah said,

Thus says the Lord: I have returned to Zion and will dwell in the midst of Jerusalem, and Jerusalem shall be called the faithful city, and the mountain of the Lord of hosts, the holy mountain.

           4      Thus says the Lord of hosts: Old men and old women shall again sit in the streets of Jerusalem, each with staff in hand because of great age.

           5      And the streets of the city shall be full of boys and girls playing in its streets.

           6      Thus says the Lord of hosts: If it is marvelous in the sight of the remnant of this people in those days, should it also be marvelous in my sight, declares the Lord of hosts?

           7      Thus says the Lord of hosts: Behold, I will save my people from the east country and from the west country,

           8      and I will bring them to dwell in the midst of Jerusalem. And they shall be my people, and I will be their God, in faithfulness and in righteousness.” [1]

And the Torah prophet Ezekiel said:

     37:1      The hand of the Lord was upon me, and he brought me out in the Spirit of the Lord and set me down in the middle of the valley; it was full of bones.

           2      And he led me around among them, and behold, there were very many on the surface of the valley, and behold, they were very dry.

           3      And he said to me, “Son of man, can these bones live?” And I answered, “O Lord God, you know.”

           4      Then he said to me, “Prophesy over these bones, and say to them, O dry bones, hear the word of the Lord.

           5      Thus says the Lord God to these bones: Behold, I will cause breath to enter you, and you shall live.

           6      And I will lay sinews upon you, and will cause flesh to come upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and you shall live, and you shall know that I am the Lord.”

           7      So I prophesied as I was commanded. And as I prophesied, there was a sound, and behold, a rattling, and the bones came together, bone to its bone.

           8      And I looked, and behold, there were sinews on them, and flesh had come upon them, and skin had covered them. But there was no breath in them.

           9      Then he said to me, “Prophesy to the breath; prophesy, son of man, and say to the breath, Thus says the Lord God: Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe on these slain, that they may live.”

         10      So I prophesied as he commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived and stood on their feet, an exceedingly great army.

         11      Then he said to me, “Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel. Behold, they say, ‘Our bones are dried up, and our hope is lost; we are indeed cut off.’

         12      Therefore prophesy, and say to them, Thus says the Lord God: Behold, I will open your graves and raise you from your graves, O my people. And I will bring you into the land of Israel.

         13      And you shall know that I am the Lord, when I open your graves, and raise you from your graves, O my people.

         14      And I will put my Spirit within you, and you shall live, and I will place you in your own land. Then you shall know that I am the Lord; I have spoken, and I will do it, declares the Lord.” [2]

Zechariah spoke around 520 BCE and Ezekiel 586 BCE:  They spoke over 2,500 years ago.

Can we not stand back and behold what has happened and not be marvelled? 

Am Yisrael chai, the People of Israel live.

Please join me in saying it again.

Am Yisrael chai, the People of Israel live.

And again.

Am Yisrael chai, the People of Israel live.

As you leave with that thought to ponder, may you return to your homes safely.  Thank you.


[1] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Zec 8:3–8). (2016). Crossway Bibles.

[2] The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Eze 37:1–14). (2016). Crossway Bibles.

The PowerPoint Slide Deck may be found here.

Resilience – Inge Woolf’s story of survival and triumph | Stuff

Inge Woolf with her daughter, Deborah Hart.

It was to be one last mother daughter adventure: penning the story of a lifetime.

They had been on a few journeys together, Inge Woolf and Deborah Hart. This last one, though, would be bittersweet.

Holocaust survivor Woolf had been part-way through writing her memoir in 2020 when she was told she was dying.

A practical woman, a realist, she told her family simply that everyone had to die sometime, recalls Hart.

Read more

Chasing the conspiracy: The long history of racism and extremism in New Zealand | Stuff

Are we the baddies? One of the most bizarre moments in a new history of racism in New Zealand comes in the late 1960s when the New Zealand National Socialist Party was in conflict with the National Socialist Party of New Zealand.

New Zealand was not big enough for two Nazi parties. One accused the other of being extremist and disruptive. One accused the other of being soft on Māori.

Of the two Nazi parties, the one led by Colin King-Ansell​ was the more successful, although even his form of success was very marginal. He won just 35 votes as a candidate for the Eden electorate in Auckland in 1972, falling to 19 votes in 1975.

Ideological feuds between tiny, fringe parties have an air of comedy about them. The inevitable comparison is with Monty Python’s People’s Front of Judea​. The anecdote, told in Histories of Hate​, shows how the story of the extreme right in this country is sometimes farcical, often confusing and largely unknown to most of us.

Read more

New Zealand, Cyprus to also boycott Durban IV conference | JPost

Arguments erupt outside the UN at the Durban IV Conference

New Zealand and Cyprus are the latest countries added to the list of those that will not take part in this month’s event marking 20 years since the World Conference Against Racism in Durban, which identified Israel alone as a racist state.

The conference was studded with anti-Semitic and anti-Israel sentiments.“

New Zealand remains strongly committed to combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance,” a spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade in Wellington said on Thursday.

“Consistent with our long-standing position, New Zealand will not attend the 20th anniversary of the Durban Declaration conference in New York on 22 September 2021.”

Durban IV will be held on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York.

Read more

FBI report reinforces trend that American Jews are ‘top target’ for hate crimes | JNS

The latest FBI report on hate crimes shows that the number of incidents continues to rise year to year in the U.S., with 7,759 hate crimes reported in 2020 as compared to 7,517 in 2019, but with fewer crimes categorized as “religiously motivated.”

Anti-Jewish bias accounted for 676 incidents — 57 percent of the 1,174 religiously motivated hate crimes in 2020 — aligning with the annual finding that the Jewish community is disproportionately targeted by religiously motivated crimes, given that Jews account for less than 2 percent of the U.S. population. The total number of incidents is down from the 953 anti-Jewish hate crimes reported in 2019, but also occurred a time of national lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read more

Juliet Moses and the Anti-Terrorism Hui Controversy | Zoom Meeting

You may have heard of the controversy surrounding the comments of Juliet Moses, the spokesperson for the NZ Jewish Council, at the recent anti-terrorism hui.

Here is the transcript of her address, so you can judge for yourself as to whether her remarks conflated terrorism with Islam as members of the Islamic community have asserted.  Click this link to read the full transcript.

Furthermore, here is an opportunity to meet Juliet herself and ask your own questions, via a Zoom meeting.  Thanks to our friends at the Israel Institute of NZ for organizing this event.  Zoom meeting details follow:

Join Dr David Cumin and Juliet Moses for a Zoom Talk on Thursday 24 June, 7pm

Ms Moses is an Auckland based lawyer and spokesperson for the Jewish Council of New Zealand. She was invited to speak at the recent Hui on Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism. In one session, there was open support for Hamas and Hezbollah, whose military wings are designated by NZ as terrorist groups. There was no challenge from the officials or leaders in the room. We will discuss this and more.

Please spread the word.

Topic: The Israel Report: David Cumin talks to Juliet Moses
Time: Jun 24, 2021 07:00 PM Auckland, Wellington

Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86476677914
Meeting ID: 864 7667 7914

RNZ interviewer undermines anti-terrorism discussion in NZ

Susie Ferguson, RNZ

Yesterday, RNZ radio broadcaster Susie Ferguson interviewed Juliet Moses, spokesperson for the NZ Jewish Council, following the controversy at the Hui on Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism in New Zealand on Tuesday, June 15.

How many need to be involved to create a terrorist risk?

When discussing the 2018 rally where attendees showed their support of Hezbollah, Susie Ferguson said (2m 30s):

“When we are talking about a rally, that makes it sound really big, I understand we are talking about 20 people, that sort of number, that’s correct isn’t it?”

Thus she implies that because such a small number of people were involved that the Jewish Community was making a mountain out of a mole hill.

To even think this way, suggests that she doesn’t understand the dynamics of a terrorist threat, despite the fact that the Mosque Massacres demonstrated that an act of terrorism can be perpetrated by a single individual, radicalised through their own personal journey, without any formal connection to an organised terrorist organisation.

If one single individual can cause so much harm, tragedy and loss of life, how much more harm, tragedy and loss of life, can twenty something individuals do, if they got together and got organised.

But wait, the fact that they were at a rally showing their support for Hezbollah, showed that they are already getting together, and getting organised…

Terrorism doesn’t respect geographic borders

When Moses cited a Hezbollah bombing that killed 85 in Buenos Aires in 1994, Ferguson cuts in, saying (3m:

“But we are talking about what’s happening in New Zealand here.”

She implies that terrorism acts and terrorism track records overseas don’t count.

But terrorism respects no geographic borders, as the Buenos Aires bombing shows, and as the Christchurch Mosque Massacre also demonstrates.

Calling out a organisation of Muslim terrorists doesn’t mean all terrorists are Muslims

In fact, in the Christchurch Mosque Massacre, not even the passage of time seemed to matter as the perpetrator cited Muslim invasions of Europe that occurred centuries ago, and they occurred overseas.

Strangely, Ferguson seemed to hold the idea that Moses’ comments conflated Islam with terrorism. She asked Moses if this was so. Moses responded by emphatically denying it.

In an interview the previous day with Andrew Little, the Minister responsible for the GCSB and NZSIS, Ferguson said Moses had declared that all Muslims were terrorists (1m50s).

When Little challenged her and said “I’m not sure that that was what was said,” she backtracked and restated her question as “the effects of her [Moses’] words, is that what was in effect what was being said here.”

A position which Andrew did not support in his reply. In fact he went on to say that later over a food, the two groups had a constructive conversation and the matter was smoothed over.

A well-meaning mistake?

It seems like she is trying to protect the Muslim community from some hideous tropes, but in doing so, she unwittingly undermined much of the good that the hui could have inspired. Instead, she has undermined the legitimacy of the Jewish community’s anxieties.

You can listen to the whole interview with Juliet Moses here:

And here is the interview with Andrew Little:

Here is an interview with Abdur Razzaq, the Federation of Islamic Associations of NZ chairperson, who led the walkout.  In it, he complains that Islam is being securitized, that is, terrorism is being conflated with the religion, and claims that Hezbollah is not a terrorist organisation, but a resistance movement:

NZFOI

Joint Statement by Friends of the New Zealand Jewish Community

Juliet Moses, NZ Jewish Council

We are deeply concerned at the response by audience members to statements made by Juliet Moses on behalf of the Jewish Council at the Hui on Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism in New Zealand. We are also disappointed by the distortion of facts by mainstream media.

It is imperative that terrorism is discussed openly and truthfully at a hui explicitly called for the purpose of countering terrorism and violent extremism in all New Zealand communities. Terrorist entities must be able to be named, whether they be far-right, Islamic, or any other groups.

Ms Moses referred to a rally in support of Hezbollah on Auckland’s Queen Street in 2018. The rally should be of concern to all New Zealanders. New Zealand has labelled the military wings of Hezbollah and Hamas as terrorist groups. However, New Zealand’s position on Hezbollah is out of step with most of our allies who recognise that there is no distinction between the military and political wings of the organisation. In fact, in 2017, The Arab League, comprised of 22 Arabic-speaking countries, designated Hezbollah a terrorist organization for destabilizing the region and posing “a threat to Arab national security by raising sectarian … and ethnic tensions”.

We affirm the call made by Ms Moses:

“We need to hear leaders condemn all support for terrorism and all terrorism equally, whatever the source, target and circumstance – and even when it is not politically expedient to do so”.

On behalf of the thousands of constituents we represent, we support Juliet Moses’ effort to bring this matter to public attention and agree that this concern must be acknowledged in order to achieve social cohesion in New Zealand. We call on our leaders to speak out clearly and unequivocally to condemn all forms of terrorism. We also call on the government to take measures to ensure that those who openly support terrorists and terrorism are censured.

Ashley Church, Israel Institute of New Zealand
Rob Berg, Zionist Federation of New Zealand
Bryce Turner, Christians For Israel
Nigel Woodley, The Protection of Zion Trust, Flaxmere Christian Fellowship, Ebenezer Operation Exodus
Derek McDowell, International Christian Embassy Jerusalem
Tony Kan, New Zealand Friends of Israel
Patrick Tupoto Manawakaiaia Ruka, Ngapuhi Kaumatua
Dr Sheree Trotter, Holocaust and Antisemitism Foundation, Aotearoa New Zealand
Simon Lawry, Friends of Israel Gospel Ministry
Stephanie Harawira, Pacific Pearls, Kia Ora Israel, Hikoi Aotearoa, Ezekiel 33 Trust, Kotahi Tatou Trust

New Zealand still not opening files on ‘resettled’ alleged former Nazi emigres | Times of Israel

Waffen SS medal ceremony

Nazi hunter Efraim Zuroff supplied a list of 50 suspected war criminals decades ago, but successive governments keep classified the immigration documents that could implicate them.

The widely reported death in New Zealand last year of former Waffen-SS soldier Willi Huber served to awaken the consciousness of New Zealanders to the reality that Nazi war criminals and sympathizers live, or have lived, among them.

Huber, who migrated to New Zealand in 1953, was a keen skier. Often referred to as “a heartland hero” and “the founding father” of the South Island’s Mt. Hutt ski field, he achieved near-legendary status in the skiing fraternity and was lauded by some media. He died never having publicly expressed any remorse for his wartime activities.

Since the end of World War II, New Zealand, like Australia, has served as a sanctuary for war refugees and other displaced persons (DPs), mainly from Europe. But not all, it seems, were honest about their background.

Read more