Israel-Palestine Conflict: The media is ‘dehumanising’ the nation of Israel | Stuff

Juliet Moses

NZFOI: Nice to see Stuff publishing a balancing opinion piece after David Galler’s naive views were published yesterday. Next time, we wonder if Stuff will publish the pro-Israel opinion article first? Here is Juliet Moses’ views on NZ media’s treatment of the current conflict.

A few days ago I rang my friend, who lives in Tel Aviv, to see how he was doing during this latest round of war between Hamas and Israel, which has seen over 3000 rockets fired at Israel from Gaza, and some from Syria and Lebanon. “Are you going out at all?” I asked. “Sure”, he answered nonchalantly, “I took my son to the playground today. There’s a bomb shelter built into it – we have 15 seconds to get in when the siren goes off”.

My friend worked on the Israeli negotiating team trying to achieve peace with the Palestinian people. He has Palestinian friends. He does not support the Israeli Prime Minister.

Dehumanising an entire nation and its supporters, who just happen to be the vast majority of Jews, is perpetuating injustice and oppression, not fighting it. The Israel I see portrayed in the media, by politicians, and by others, is not the Israel I know and love.

It has become detached from reality and context, an abstraction, caricatured, villianised, a symbol of what’s wrong in the world, a repository for a person’s woes, an ideological flag-post. It seems we need a “narrative” these days, with a goodie and a baddie. Israel isn’t a narrative, and like every other nation, it encompasses people who are somewhere inbetween.

I think of the staff I met at Zvi hospital near the Syrian border in 2016, who were treating Syrians injured in Syria’s civil war.

I remember George Deek, the young Christian Arab diplomat taking me around Jaffa, where his family has lived for over 300 years, including to a beautiful Ottoman Empire mosque.

I still salivate when I think of the traditional lunch, chicken maqlooba, we had in a Druze family’s home in the Golan Heights. And that reminds me of the same dish I enjoyed visiting a non-profit centre set up for Bedouin women in the Negev.

I think of Ikey, recounting the gripping fear he felt in the lead-up to the 1967 war, when he was a young boy and Israelis thought the state was about to be wiped out by invading Arab armies, being told to collect stones and whatever projectiles he could and go up to the roof.

I think too of the Palestinian people I have spent time with in the West Bank.

I’ve met many politicians, including the Palestinian Prime Minister. But the person who had the most profound impact on me was Ali, who I have met with twice. He co-founded, with a Jewish man, “a grassroots movement of understanding, nonviolence and transformation among Israelis and Palestinians”.

Ali told me that both Jews and Palestinians must realise that the land does not belong to them, but they belong to the land. He recognised that his people’s identity is rooted in victimhood, and that needed to change.

I also dined near Bethlehem with an Israeli and Palestinian, who are part of a “parents’ circle”, who each lost a daughter in the conflict. They call each other “brother”.

I think of the female Palestinians – the journalist who bemoaned the deteriorating freedoms, lack of elections, and corruption under Fatah’s leadership, and the activist who was concerned about the regression of women’s rights.

There’s Palestinian billionaire Bashar Masri who is building the first planned Palestinian city in the West Bank, Rawabi, hailed as “the cornerstone of a new, modern, viable Palestinian society”. He believes Palestinians must show the world that they are not just victims and can build a state. He abhors the fact that the Palestinian Authority leaves its people living under its control in refugee camps.

And I remember the Gazans I met who worked at the border crossing, who talked of how much they despised Hamas, the terrorist group that oppressively rules Gaza.

Most Jews and Israelis yearn for peace, and want to see Palestinians have their own state. But Jewish people carry both the scars of a world without a Jewish homeland and the knowledge that it has provided refuge for millions of Jews from a post-Holocaust Europe, Iraq, Iran, the Soviet Union, Yemen and Ethiopia.

Israelis also carry the scars of the second intifada, which followed failed peace talks, when they sent their children off to school in separate buses in the hope that at least one wouldn’t return in a body bag (the Palestinian people still pay the price too, with a security barrier and checkpoints that were not there before).

Israelis carry the scars too of Israel’s unilateral withdrawal from Gaza in 2005, displacing 8000 Jews from their homes, in the hopes of peace, which brought them a terror state and the rockets they are bombarded with. That is not a risk they can take with the West Bank, and so the status quo remains, even though pretty much no one likes it.

Despite being a majority in Israel, its Jews have the mindset and anxieties of a minority, given their neighbours. In a state one half the size of Canterbury, their margin of error and survival is very small. Standing at the borders with Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria, all controlled by Iran and embedded with its proxies, who repeatedly call for the destruction of Israel, this is easy to understand.

Indeed, only someone who has the privilege of not living that way and who has no empathy, could fail to understand that. It is easier to be moralistic when your life is not at stake. That includes some Jews who feel the need to apologise and proclaim that they are one of the few “good Jews”. Other Jews, however, have learned that appeasement doesn’t work.

  • Juliet Moses is spokesperson for the New Zealand Jewish Council.
  • Source

As a Jewish New Zealander I am ashamed by Israel’s long history of inflaming tensions in the Mideast | Stuff

David Galler

NZFOI: Nothing new. Gullible. No root cause analysis. Lays the blame on Israel’s shoulders alone. Implies Arabs can do no wrong. Once again. And no sustainable solutions proffered. It would be interesting to see if, in the interests of ethical journalism, Stuff publishes an opinion piece with the opposing view, in a timely manner.

I am not the only proud Jewish person who is deeply disturbed by the violent unrest currently engulfing Israel and the Palestinian people. I am not alone in feeling embarrassed and ashamed by Israel’s long history of inflaming tensions in the region, and I am not alone in being deeply concerned about the impact of this cycle of perpetual violence on the local population and the wider diaspora.

No matter the rights and wrongs that may have initiated these hostilities so long ago, in the absence of a resolution or an accommodation that brings lasting peace, there will be only one end to this, a result currently playing out in front of our eyes: a steady but irreversible brutalisation of all involved to the point where even children become legitimate targets, or their killing accepted as collateral damage “for the greater good” by both parties, leaving both populations fatally changed forever.

Read the whole article.

Green Party’s motion to declare Palestine a state fails in Parliament | Stuff

Green Party MP Golriz Ghahraman

The Green Party motion asking MPs to recognise Palestine as a state has failed in the House, with National and ACT MPs objecting to the effort.

Green Party MP Golriz Ghahraman​ on Wednesday afternoon sought leave of the House to debate a motion asking MPs to recognise “the state of Palestine among our community of nations”.

New Zealand does not recognise Palestine as a state but supports a two-state solution to the conflict, which would mean the creation of a Palestinian state.

National Party foreign affairs spokesman Gerry Brownlee told Stuff on Wednesday morning that, while the party supported a two-state solution, it would not support the motion.

“We have followed that two-state concept since it was first proposed in 1993 and there have been many attempts to get it together but it has not yet been achieved, and I think to leap ahead of the negotiations by recognising Palestine as a state is pretty much an act of bad faith,” Brownlee said.

Read more

A feuding family | Dominion Post

NZFOI: This thought provoking letter to the Editor was published in today’s Dominion Post

Words affect our understanding of the world. Language can be poetic, describe fiction and fine reality. As a Jewish New Zealander, the language being used in New Zealand media surrounding the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is concerning.
Words such as coloniser and ethnic cleansing are being used to create an image of Israel as an out-of-control superpower, imposing its will on and seeking to annihilate its Palestinian neighbours.

Change the words, however, to homecoming and self defence, and you see a picture of Israel as a land which has seen the return of its people taken away as slaves 2000 years ago, compelled to act when attacked.

Currently, New Zealand media we see David and glass story. But what if we changed the paradigms to 1 of the feuding family, where descendants of the shed ancestor or tupuna (in this case the biblical forefather Abraham) both have manua whenua or valid claims to the land. Palestinians and Jews have overlapping interests in the Holy Land.
Jewish tino rangatiratanga in Israel, formalised in 1948, need not come at the expense of Palestinian tino rangatiratanga. The rallies this past weekend around New Zealand call for a one-sided condemnation of the violence.

Rather, Kiwis should call for co-existence and a two-state solution to be born through negotiation, not through blood.

Dr Michelle Gezentsvey Lamy, Wallaceville.

Statement on the escalation of violence in Israel, the Occupied Palestinian Territories and Gaza | NZ Govt

Nanaia Mahuta, NZ Minister of Foreign Affairs

NZFOI: The NZ Government has released a statement regarding the current escalation of violence between Israel and the Arabs. In her statement, she is implying the root cause of the violence is Israel’s forced evictions occurring in East Jerusalem. However the matter she is referring to is an ongoing legal dispute between Arabs who occupied those properties after Jordan’s illegal invasion of Israel and Israelis who fled during that conflict and want them repatriated. In the 1970s Israel passed laws that legalised the repatriation of such properties provided there was sufficient proof of ownership. In NZFOI’s opinion, MFAT’s root cause analysis is flawed. Here is the NZ government’s full statement:

BEGINS

Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today expressed Aotearoa New Zealand’s grave concern at the escalation of violence in Israel, the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and Gaza.

“The growing death toll and the large numbers of casualties, including children, from Israeli airstrikes and Gazan rockets is unacceptable,” Nanaia Mahuta said

“Senior officials met with the Israeli Ambassador yesterday. Officials underlined the concerning loss of life and strongly urged Israel to de-escalate to prevent the prospect of a widening conflict. They also raised their concern at the continued violation of international law and forced evictions occurring in East Jerusalem.

“The launching of rockets towards Israel by Hamas is unacceptable and must stop. At the same time any response from Israel should be restrained and must avoid civilian casualties. All sides have a responsibility to de-escalate, stop the violence and prevent further suffering and loss of life.

“Aotearoa New Zealand stands ready to assist in any constructive way we can to support urgent de-escalation of the situation.” Nanaia Mahuta said.

ENDS

AIR New Zealand: Super Fund move raises BDS questions | AIJAC

Questions over just how much influence the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement has in New Zealand are being voiced following the NZ Super Fund’s recent divestment from five Israeli banks.

In March, the Guardians of New Zealand Superannuation, an autonomous crown entity and manager of the NZ$50 billion NZ Super Fund, announced it was ending its NZ$6.5 million investment in the First International Bank of Israel, Israel Discount Bank, Bank Hapoalim, Bank Leumi, and Bank Mizrahi-Tefahot.

The NZ Super Fund said it was doing so on responsible investment grounds as there was “credible evidence” that the banks provide finance for the construction of Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

“In our view, based on the information available to us, the companies’ activities are inconsistent with the UN Global Compact, the key benchmark against which the Guardians measures corporate behaviour,” it said. 

Predictably, well-known opponents of Israel, like the Palestinian Solidarity Network chaired by anti-Israel advocate John Minto, greeted the news enthusiastically. 

Green Party foreign affairs spokesperson Golriz Ghahraman told the Spinoff the decision “exemplifies compliance with domestic and international (sic) in terms of investment in Israeli occupied Palestine, which all NZ institutions and companies should be meeting.”

However, National Party MP Nicola Willis reportedly said at a select committee meeting that the fund’s decision was controversial and “viewed by some groups as potentially aligning New Zealand with an antisemitic movement (i.e.: BDS).”

Read more

The Nazi Who Built Mount Hutt | North and South

The untold story of a former Waffen-SS soldier who lied his way into New Zealand — and got away with it.

By Andrew Macdonald and Naomi Arnold

Cover illustration by Ross Murray

In a lonely lodge high in New Zealand’s Southern Alps, three soldiers sipped schnapps and swapped war stories long into the winter night. It was a Saturday evening in the mid-1960s, freezing cold outside, and the middle-aged veterans were relaxing after a day spent wheeling down the ski slopes of North Canterbury. They knocked back nips at one end of the common room while other guests at the private lodge chatted around the roaring pot-bellied stove at the other. The bottle drew empty as the evening drew long.

Charlie Upham, in his mid-50s and reserved, was an infantry legend, the holder of the exceptionally rare Victoria Cross and Bar for battlefield valour in Greece, Crete and North Africa. Brian Rawson, a more sociable man of a similar age, had commanded Sherman tanks in North Africa and Italy. The third man was Willi Huber, a charismatic Austrian in his 40s with blond-brown hair and grey eyes, and he had a very different kind of war story.

Rawson, by then a banker in Christchurch, and Upham, who’d taken up farming in Hundalee, had hired Huber as a ski instructor for a few weeks at Amuri Ski Lodge near Hanmer Springs. Huber had emigrated to New Zealand in the 1950s, and told people he had been roped into the German army as a teenager — meaning he had fought for Adolf Hitler’s Nazi regime in World War II. Upham and Rawson accepted this. “We might have been shooting at one another,” Rawson joked to Huber.

“Soldiers understand that soldiers get called up, and that it’s all political,” recalls Debbie Rawson, Brian’s daughter, who Huber taught to ski. To the two Kiwi veterans, Huber was just a regular “good guy”, popular with the ski-lodge crowd and one of thousands of Europeans starting a new life in postwar New Zealand. Debbie remembers the three men drinking and chatting together in the lodge’s common room, “telling jokes and roaring their heads off with laughter”.

The Austrian went on to build a name for himself in the clannish Canterbury outdoors scene as an expert skier and alpine hiker. He took an interest in people and pitched in to get things done, in the Kiwi way. His crowning achievement was helping establish the internationally known Mount Hutt ski field, which memorialised him with an advanced 821-metre ski run named Huber’s Run as well as a plaque in his honour. Huber’s Hut restaurant served Huber’s Breakfast Burger, Huber’s Smoked Salmon Salad, Willie’s Angus Burger, and Willie’s Midweek Breakfast Special. His achievements were celebrated in a string of articles over the years in local and national media that only briefly touched on his past as a “war hero” in the “German army”.

Then, in 2017, came a shocking admission: Huber told TVNZ’s Sunday programme he had served in Hitler’s feared elite guard, the Waffen-SS. This was at stark odds with the narrative he had carefully maintained for 65 years. Far from being a naive conscript, Huber had volunteered for one of the most notorious criminal organisations the world has ever known. Following the interview, and particularly after his death in August 2020, pressure mounted to strip Huber’s name from Mt Hutt.

Nearly a year after Huber’s death, his past has never been fully unravelled. Many of his stories remain accepted without scrutiny. Now, for the first time, drawing on interviews with people who knew him and official documents from archives, libraries and private collections in five countries, North & South has pieced together the life of this Nazi warrior turned Kiwi alpine legend. We discovered that the true nature of his role in the war was very different from what he claimed, and that he lied on his immigration application in order to enter New Zealand. On multiple occasions over the years, he spoke of his service for Nazi Germany with pride.

In the 1960s, Huber and Upham’s paths crossed at Craigieburn Valley Ski Area, in inland Canterbury. Huber overheard some skiers talking excitedly about the presence of a double Victoria Cross winner. He later told his friend Len Vidgen that he became quite “peeved” at all the attention Upham was getting. “He thought, ‘Fuck that, I’ve got an Iron Cross’,” Vidgen says. Huber told Vidgen that he got into his car and drove the four-hour return journey to retrieve the medal from his home in Christchurch. When he got back, he showed it to Upham: a black cross pattée of iron with a silver frame — and in the middle, a swastika.

Read the article in the June issue of North and South Magazine. Available through your library or nearest bookseller.

New Zealand’s Sovereign Wealth Fund damages its reputation by divesting from Israeli banks| FDD

David May, Research Analyst, Foundation for Defense of Democracies

New Zealand’s $36 billion sovereign wealth fund divested $4 million from five Israeli banks last month because of their West Bank operations. This could cause reputational and financial problems for New Zealand and for companies managing its sovereign wealth fund.

Flawed information and analysis spurred the fund’s decision. In a letter explaining the move, the Guardians – the government entity that runs New Zealand’s sovereign wealth fund – cites concern about Israel’s plans to annex portions of the West Bank. However, Israel agreed to suspend its annexation plans in September 2020 as part of its peace deals with the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain. Subsequently, UAE-based Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank signed a memorandum of understanding with Bank Leumi, one of the Israeli banks subject to divestment.

The letter erroneously describes United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334, which declared that Israeli settlement activity “has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law,” as “binding.” However, the council passed that resolution under the non-binding Chapter VI.

The Guardians’ letter also relies on reports by the UN Human Rights Council, a body composed of numerous autocracies that has passed nearly as many resolutions criticizing Israel as the rest of the world combined. This reality undermines the credibility of the council’s reports.

Thanks to the Guardians’ decision, Israeli companies now comprise 11 of the fund’s 53 divestments not related to tobacco or cannabis. Two of these are Israeli construction companies from which New Zealand divested in 2012 for building West Bank settlements. The Guardians excluded the others for manufacturing certain weapons or for alleged labor or unethical-conduct issues.

Yet even as they condemn Israel, the Guardians invest in one of the world’s leading human rights abusers. The fund holds nearly half a billion dollars’ worth of investments in 625 Chinese companies, including two companies blacklisted by the United States for violating the rights of ethnic minorities. China has detained up to 1 million Uighurs from Xinjiang province, suppressed pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, and continues to occupy Tibet.

Likewise, while the fund divested from Israeli banks, it invests in companies extracting natural resources from another disputed territory. On March 15, New Zealand’s High Court upheld the sovereign wealth fund’s right to invest in companies operating in Western Sahara, a non-self-governing territory occupied by Morocco.

Two New Zealand companies included in the fund import around $30 million worth of phosphate from the disputed territory annually. Morocco’s alleged facilitation of the extraction of natural resources from an occupied territory appears to contravene Article 55 of the 1907 Fourth Hague Convention.

Israeli banks have faced divestment in the past. In January 2014, Dutch pension firm PGGM announced it was divesting from the same Israeli banks that New Zealand’s fund excluded. The Financial Times reported that several senior PGGM executives later regretted the decision because it inadvertently thrust the company into the politics of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In the same month, Denmark’s Danske Bank terminated operations with Israel’s Bank Hapoalim, prompting Illinois’ Investment Policy Board to bar investment in Danske.

Accordingly, U.S. states such as Illinois that impose restrictions on the investment of public funds in companies boycotting Israel should prohibit investment in financial management firms implementing the Guardians’ anti-Israel divestment policy.

On their website, the Guardians state that avoiding reputational damage is one of their guiding principles. The fund’s exclusion of Israeli companies while continuing to invest in problematic businesses elsewhere could damage the fund’s reputation if members of Congress voiced their displeasure. This would carry significant weight, since the United States is New Zealand’s third-largest trading partner.

David May is a research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), where he also contributes to FDD’s Center on Economic and Financial Power (CEFP). For more analysis from David and CEFP, please subscribe HERE. Follow David on Twitter @DavidSamuelMay. Follow FDD on Twitter @FDD and @FDD_CEFP. FDD is a Washington, DC-based, nonpartisan research institute focusing on national security and foreign policy.

Source

Maori and Israelis: Peoples of the Land | Times of Israel

Ngapuhi’s powhiri

While Earth Day marks the anniversary of the birth of the modern environmental movement in 1970, for indigenous peoples, living in close connection with the environment and being caretakers of the land is part of the culture, hence Māori are called tangata whenua, people of the land.

A special event organized by a Māori tribe in the north of Aotearoa New Zealand to welcome the new Israeli Ambassador also provided a unique opportunity to mark Earth Day.

Read more

The man who survived Dr Mengele | Newsroom

Benjamin Steiner

Benjamin Steiner died in Auckland last week at the age of 81, and as Mark Jennings writes, his life story was unique in many ways

Benjamin Steiner cut a distinctive figure with his dapper clothes, trilby hat and twinkly eyes. But belying that appearance, his body covered in scars and the number A-421734 tattooed on his left forearm, was a terrible truth.

Steiner was a survivor of Auschwitz, and the subject of the notorious Dr Josef Mengele’s experiments.

The small, softly-spoken man lived in New Zealand most of his life. He was a professional and passionate saxophonist and worked as chief purser for the airline that became Air New Zealand.

Born in 1935 in Budapest, he was 8 years old when he was transported to Auschwitz – Birkenau in a railway wagon. By 1944, 12,000 Jews were being delivered to Auschwitz on an average day.

Winston Churchill once described the treatment of Hungarian Jews as the “greatest and most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world…”.

Read more