Zionism: A Jewish American’s experience

Last Sunday we enjoyed a talk from Shmuel, a member of the board of the Canterbury Hebrew Congregation. He was born and raised in the USA.

While he was at university he had been an active member of the Jewish student community.

After graduating with his Master’s degree, he made aliyah where he joined the Israeli Navy as an industrial engineer.

Now he is in New Zealand, working for a technology company and seeking residency.

Here is an audio recording of his talk, that gives his reflections on his experiences and thoughts on what could be done to support Israel from New Zealand.

 

 

Israel offers aid to NZ after Cyclone Gabrielle

                                                                             

MEDIA RELEASE 21 FEBRUARY 2023

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Last week, on behalf of the State of Israel, His Excellency Ambassador Ran Yaakoby expressed deepest sympathies to the people of Aotearoa New Zealand following Cyclone Gabrielle in a letter to the New Zealand Government and local councils. The Ambassador stated that, “Israel remains ready and willing to help Aotearoa New Zealand in this time of need and offers its assistance to support in the recovery efforts to restore people’s homes and livelihoods.”

The letter (see below) and a virtual catalogue of options based on Israeli advanced technologies and know-how were sent and are under review by the relevant government ministries, the National Emergency Management Agency (NEMA), and the affected local councils.

On behalf of the State of Israel, I extend deepest sympathies to the people of Aotearoa New Zealand following the devastating floods.

Israel remains ready and willing to help Aotearoa New Zealand in this time of need and offers its assistance to support in the recovery efforts to restore people’s homes and livelihoods.

As a first step, I have attached for you a catalogue listing emergency water management and other water companies that may be able to provide solutions to the current challenges as well as those that lie ahead in the medium to long term.

Furthermore, if there are other areas in which you need assistance, please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Sincerely,

Ran Yaakoby

Ambassador of Israel to New Zealand

 

 

NZ’s UN voting history regarding Israel | UN Watch

UN Watch has put together a handy resource that lets anyone look up any country’s UN voting history with regarding to Israel.

Here’s a link to New Zealand’s voting record:  New Zealand – UN Watch Database.  

From there, you can look up any other country’s record too.

UN Inquiry member on Israel shows anti-Israel bias at the outset | JTA

Miloon Kothari, a member of the UN Human Rights Council’s special commission into Israel and the Palestinian territories

(JTA) – A United Nations commission formed to investigate alleged human rights abuses in Israel and the Palestinian Territories is under renewed scrutiny this week as two prominent American diplomats have accused one of its members of anti-Israel and antisemitic speech.

Deborah Lipstadt, the State Department’s special envoy on antisemitism, and Michèle Taylor, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Human Rights Council, both condemned Miloon Kothari, a diplomat who sits on the council’s Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Including East Jerusalem, and in Israel.

In an interview with pro-Palestinian website Mondoweiss this week, Kothari questioned “why [Israel is] even a member of the United Nations,” and made a comment linking social media efforts to discredit the commission to “the Jewish lobby,” comments the diplomats said were anti-Israel and antisemitic.

“Outrageous that an [UN Human Rights Council] appointed human rights expert on Israel and the West Bank and Gaza repeated antisemitic tropes & questioned Israel’s legitimacy as a UN member,” Lipstadt tweeted Thursday.

Read more

How to deal with Despots | Economist

NZFOI: A thought provoking piece from the Economist. Pragmatism v Idealism? What to do when there is a clash between societies over Vision and Values? Relevant issues that Israel has to daily wrestle with. In sharing this article, NZFOI is not saying we agree with the Economists ideas. But it is useful to start reflection and discussion.

For about 15 years after the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, Western foreign policy seemed to rest on sure foundations. Liberal values—democracy, open markets, human rights and the rule of law—had just prevailed over communism. America, the first and only global hyperpower, had the clout to impose this moral code against terrorists and tyrants. And tough love was justified, because history had shown that Western values were the uncontested formula for peace, prosperity and progress.

Another 15 years on, Western foreign policy is in a mess. To see why, consider Muhammad bin Salman, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia. Our summer double issue, featuring profiles and long reads, leads with a deeply reported portrait of mbs, as he is known. It illustrates the erosion of each of the three pillars of Western foreign policy—values, power and that historic destiny.

The moral calculus turns out to be fraught. As our profile concludes, the crown prince has a tendency to be violent and erratic and to oppress his foes. He has been held responsible for the murder of a Washington Post columnist. Yet he is also a moderniser who has liberalised Saudi society, tamed the kingdom’s clerics and given women new freedoms. Even if you doubt mbs’s reforming zeal, Saudi Arabia produces oil that could help America and its allies withstand an even more dangerous man: Vladimir Putin. Is the ethical policy to shun mbs or sup with him?

mbs also shows that American power is less imposing than it seemed 15 years ago. Saudi Arabia has been close to America since 1945, but mbs long snubbed Joe Biden by refusing to take his phone calls, instead palling up with an assertive Russia and a rising China. Saudi Arabia is key to a region that America tried to mend by invading Iraq but, although America and its allies are still formidable, the fighting has worn out voters’ willingness to see their troops act as a global police force. Their reluctance is understandable. The desert wars demonstrated that you cannot turn people into liberals by firing guns at them.

And history has bitten back. A young man in a hurry, mbs believes he can achieve Western levels of prosperity without the inconvenience of democracy or human rights. Justin Bieber and Monster-Jam motorsports sit snugly alongside his despotic rule.

mbs is not alone. China is asserting the merits of “people-centred” human rights that put peace and economic development above voting and free speech. Mr Putin has invaded Ukraine in what can be thought of as a war on Enlightenment values by a regime in thrall to a Russian brand of fascism. When Western leaders entreat the global south to stand up for the international system by condemning Mr Putin, many say that they have lost patience with preachy, hypocritical Westerners who readily invade other countries whenever it suits them.

The Economist has not lost its faith in the institutions that emerged from the Enlightenment. Liberal values are universal. Yet the West’s strategy for promoting its world-view is sputtering and America and its allies need to be clearer-eyed. They must balance what is desirable with what is possible. At the same time they must cleave to the principles that save them from the cynicism of Mr Putin’s desolate, truth-free zone. That sounds like a counsel of perfection. Can it work?

The best way for Western leaders to avoid charges of hypocrisy is to refrain from staking out moral positions they cannot sustain. While campaigning, Mr Biden pledged to treat Saudi Arabia as a “pariah”. But this month he went to Jeddah and fist-bumped mbs and was widely condemned for hypocrisy and moral cowardice. In fact, his mistake was a crowd-pleasing pledge that was always going to be a millstone in office.

Western leaders need to be honest about how much influence they really have. The assumption that the rest need the West more than the West needs the rest is less true these days. In 1991 the g7 produced 66% of global output; today, just 44%. In hindsight it was hubris to think that dictatorships could be cured of their pathologies by battalions of human-rights lawyers and market economists. Leaders ought to be clear about right and wrong, but when they weigh up whether to impose sanctions on wrongdoers they should assess the likely results rather than the appearances of virtue.

Another principle is that talking is usually good. Some say that turning up bestows legitimacy. In reality, it generates insights, creates a chance to exert influence and helps solve otherwise insoluble problems—by means of climate deals, say; or getting grain out of Ukraine; or asking al-Shabab, an affiliate of al-Qaeda, to help save Somalia from starvation. Mr Biden was right to talk to mbs. Emmanuel Macron, France’s president, is right to talk to Mr Putin. Everyone needs to talk to China’s president, Xi Jinping.

There are ways to help keep talks honest. In meetings you can have your say on human rights. You can temper your contact, as Mr Macron did after Russian troops committed war crimes. You can insist on also speaking to the opposition and to dissidents. In this and other things, Western leaders should co-ordinate with each other so that they are less likely to be picked off by a policy of divide and rule—by China over its treatment of dissidents abroad, for example, or the abuse of the Uyghur people in Xinjiang.

A last principle is to acknowledge that foreign policy, like all government, involves trade-offs. For most countries that is so obvious it hardly needs saying. But the West came to think that it could have it all. Such trade-offs need not be grubby. A clearer focus on outcomes after the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 might have led to more effective action by nato countries than the weak, conscience-salving sanctions they actually imposed. Unfortunately, Mr Biden’s simplistic attempt to divide the world into democracies and autocracies makes wise trade-offs harder.

Ideals and their consequences
The West has discovered that simply trying to impose its values on despots like mbs is ultimately self-defeating. Instead, it should marry pressure with persuasion and plain-speaking with patience. That may not be as gratifying as outraged denunciations and calls for boycotts and symbolic sanctions. But it is more likely to do some good.

Source

Fighting Back | AIR

Dr Sheree Trotter

Fervent anti-Israel rhetoric and propaganda have been hitting the headlines in New Zealand of late, and pro-Israel advocates are saying there is a need to step up the fight against them. 

In mid-May, plans for “Nakba Day” commemorations in Wellington were dealt a blow by the city’s Mayor, Andy Foster. Originally, activists planned to light up a council-owned convention centre in the colours of the Palestinian flag. 

Advice from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade prompted Foster to cancel the projection. This led to a “guerrilla projection” on the outside of the national museum, Te Papa, unsuccessful requests to meet Foster and a lot of sympathetic media coverage.

Then in June, the annual Doc Edge documentary film festival attracted the ire of Palestinian advocacy groups, who responded with a vocal boycott campaign by the Palestinian Solidarity Network (chaired by veteran anti-Israel activist John Minto) and the Palestinians in the Aotearoa Co-ordinating Committee.

It was not the first time the Academy Award-qualifying Doc Edge festival, which usually features several Israeli or Jewish-themed films, had been targeted. Back in 2018, the screening of a Ben-Gurion documentary resulted in Boycott,  Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement threats and the disruption of screenings by activists armed with fake bombs.

On this occasion, it is claimed the boycott calls were due to the festival having the Israeli Embassy as one of its sponsors. But the activists focused their anger on the film that the Embassy was sponsoring, Dead Sea Guardians, about the efforts of a Palestinian, an Israeli and a Jordanian to save the Dead Sea. 

Indigenous Coalition for Israel director Dr Sheree Trotter, who spearheaded a counter-campaign of support for the festival, said the film had been shown in many Arabic and European countries and it was only in New Zealand that a boycott had been called for. 

“The ridiculous part about this is that the film promotes a message of co-operation and working together, accepting each other’s narratives and creating a new narrative, for the collaborative goal of saving the Dead Sea from drying out.”

Read more

The Legacy of an Experiment | AIR

Bennett and Lapid making a joint statement on June 20

On June 20, a year and one week after it was sworn in, Israel’s 36th government ended with a press conference. Embattled Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, by now the head of a broken and divided Yamina (“Rightwards”) party, announced that he would be stepping down as PM. He further announced that his coalition partner and current Foreign Minister Yair Lapid, the chairman of the Yesh Atid (“There is a future”) party, would become Israel’s interim PM until an election is held.

Opposition Leader Binyamin Netanyahu was trying to avert this outcome by attempting to build an alternative majority to support his own leadership without an election but, at press time, he looked unlikely to succeed.

In any case, many Israeli analysts and politicians are now referring to the outgoing eight-party ruling coalition as an “experiment” which failed. 

Read more

From Raglan to Palestine

Massafar Yatta

Recently John Minto penned an article called “From Raglan to Palestine” and was published in the NZ Herald.

Here are the actual facts behind the inhabitation of Massafar Yatta and the dispute over this area.

Background Information on Military Zone 918:

Firing Zone 918 was declared as a “Military Zone” and as an exclusive IDF training zone by the Military Commander of the area in 1980.

According to evidence collected by the IDF, which includes aerial photographs, prior to 1980, individuals entered the Firing Zone from time to time for pasturage and agricultural cultivation purposes. However, they did notreside in the territory of the Firing Zone permanently at any point in time (neither in caves nor in permanent structures). There were some locals who stayed in the Firing Zone only temporarily for short seasonal periods in order to cultivate the ground and shepherd their livestock.

Over the years, various legal proceedings took place in connection with illegal structures that were established after 1980 in the Firing Zone. The illegal construction prevented the IDF from using the area as a training zone because of concerns over the safety of the illegal trespassers.

As of today, there is still a case pending before the Israeli High Court of Justice (“HCJ”) concerning the aforementioned illegal construction (the case was brought before the court in 2013 by petitioners from the surrounding area). The court issued an interim injunction, according to which both parties must respect the current status quo until a final judgment is delivered. The IDF has accordingly refrained from evicting the inhabitants from the illegal structures, and as a result, cannot use the area for its declared purposes.  In contrast, the illegal construction in the area continues to expand. As a result, the Civil Administration in the West Bank has no choice but to enforce the court’s order and maintain public order in the area by demolishing new illegal structures that are not protected by the court’s interim injunction.

The HCJ recently ordered the parties to try to reach a compromise which would allow the IDF to practice in the Firing Zone without endangering the lives of the population from the surrounding area, and which at the same time would allow the population from the surrounding area to cultivate their crops and shepherd their livestock.

The IDF suggested several possible solutions in order to reach a compromise. For instance, it suggested that each party use the territory on different days of the week, i.e., that the IDF use the area for training purposes in accordance with its pre-set training program while the population from the surrounding area use the territory (for its own purposes) on Fridays, Saturdays, holidays, as well as additional optional days that would be subject to prior coordination and approval from the relevant authorities. Unfortunately, the latter proposal, along with other IDF proposals, were rejected by the petitioners.

In recent years, official Palestinian bodies have orchestrated the illegal construction in the Firing Zone in hopes of demonstrating their alleged control over the territory, which is located in the disputed area near Hebron. It should be made clear that this is by no means a “local initiative” of the local population. Rather, it is part of a well-organized strategic plan of the Palestinian Authority.

On August 10, 2020, the HCJ held a hearing in the aforementioned case. Once again, the court tried to encourage the parties to reach a compromise and the petitioners refused to accept any compromise offers.

Source: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Israel

Minto’s article

Minto’s “From Raglan to Palestine” is full of false tropes about Israel’s presence in the Middle East.

  1. Israel is a colony of foreigners displacing the indigenous Palestinians.  In fact, the Jewish people have a history that predates any Arab claims over the land by thousands of years.
  2. Palestinians are indigenous.  In fact, they are Arab conquerors.
  3. Israel evicted 700,000 people in 1948.  In fact, the surrounding Arab nations invaded the newly created and UN sanctioned state of Israel and most of the people fled the conflict of their own volition and many were encouraged to do so by Arab leaders who thought that they could return once victory over the Jews was quickly won.
  4. Israel is guilty of ethnic cleansing.  In fact, 20 per cent of Israeli citizens are Arab.  We should ask, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, where are your Jews?  Maybe we should ask the neighbouring Arab countries the same question, where are your Jews?  There used to be many.  Who is really guilty of ethnic cleansing?   

Minto’s article is behind a paywall on the NZ Herald site, so here is the text from the article:

During World War I, the New Zealand Government took a big area of land at Raglan from the local Tainui Awhiro people to build an airfield and bunker as part of the local war preparations.

The airfield was never built and, instead of returning the land to the people, the government used the Public Works Act in 1928 to give legal justification for the Crown keeping the land.

In 1967, local iwi were evicted from the land and forced to rebuild nearby with the Government then selling the land for the Raglan Golf Course.

In the early 1970s, Tainui Awhiro, led by Māori activist Eva Rickard, began the fight to have the land returned and after much protest, marches, petitions, lobbying, occupations and arrests on the golf links themselves they were finally successful in 1983. The land was handed back – but not until they had fought off a government “offer” requiring them to buy their land back from the Crown.

It was my first experience of being part, in a very small way, of a Māori land protest.

One of the important things I remember from Raglan, Bastion Pt and those early land protests were the messages of support and solidarity which came in from around the country and all over the world. Typically, these would be read out at the start of a protest hui and local iwi and supporters took great heart from them. They lifted spirits and warmed hearts when things sometimes seemed bleak.

We have a long way to go in decolonisation in Aotearoa New Zealand but we have come a significant way from the crude government behaviour at Raglan.

On the other side of the world, colonisation in Palestine is continuing apace since the mass expulsions of Palestinians from their land in 1948 (more than700,000 people evicted from their homes and land by Israeli militias from more than 500 villages with dozens of civilian massacres along the way).

Every day for the past 74 years, more Palestinians have been evicted from their land using all manner of spurious, creative justifications, backed by a court system run by the Israeli colonisers.

In the spotlight today are 12 Palestinian villages with more than 1000 people who face eviction from their land in an area of the South Hebron Hills called Masafer Yatta.

An Israeli court has given the Israeli army the go-ahead to evict the people and take over their land for a “live firing range”. The range isn’t needed. The Israeli army already has close to 18 per cent of the occupied West Bank set aside for firing zones – it’s just a commonly used pretext for land theft.

If the Israeli army is able to evict these people, it will be the largest eviction of Palestinians in over 50 years.

Like the early colonists in New Zealand, Israel wants the land without the people.

Masafer Yatta is Palestine’s Raglan Golf Course, albeit on a larger scale and as part of the longest-running military occupation in modern times.

The people of Masafer Yatta are fighting back with protests and vowing not to move despite five weeks of thuggish bullying by Israeli military with vehicles racing around the land in a massive show of force to intimidate and cower the people. Live bullets ripped through roofs of houses in the Khallat Al Dabea village during this “military training”.

The local Palestinian people are organising to defend their land and homes against Israel’s aggressive colonisation.

Young people are on the frontline. Co-founder of non-violent resistance group Youth of Samud (Sumud means “steadfastness”) Sami Hurraini was detained by the Israeli army in the hot sun for eight hours without food or water last week but is undaunted. Despite receiving a demolition order for their centre in Masafer Yatta, Hurraini says, “Of course Israel won’t stop us! We will rebuild the centre every time they demolish it.”

The least we can do is add our voices of international support and solidarity to the people of Masafer Yatta. We need to let them know they are not alone – just as similar messages gave heart to Māori fighting land theft here.

And we have to let Israel know there are accountabilities for ethnic cleansing and the war crimes associated with colonisation of Palestinian land.

Palestinians are not looking for our sympathy – they are looking for practical solidarity. If enough voices are raised around the world Israel will be forced to back down.

The strongest voice we have is the Government’s. We need to insist our Government uses it on behalf of all of us.

  • John Minto is a political activist and spokesperson for Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa
  • First published in NZ Herald

New Zealand becomes an Observer of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance

MINISTRY STATEMENTS & SPEECHES: 23 June 2022

Minister of Foreign Affairs for New Zealand, Nanaia Mahuta

On Friday 24 June, Aotearoa New Zealand’s application to become an Observer of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) was accepted by the Alliance’s membership.

The IHRA is an intergovernmental organisation that promotes “international political coordination to combat growing Holocaust denial and antisemitism”. The objectives of the IHRA strongly align with Aotearoa New Zealand’s commitment to combatting antisemitism.

Through becoming an Observer we will be joining 44 other member or Observer countries to strengthen, advance and promote Holocaust education, research and remembrance.

Aotearoa New Zealand strongly believes that the international community must stand firm against every form of intolerance wherever it may be found. It is only through an understanding of the lessons of history that we can ensure atrocities such as the Holocaust never happen again.

The International Holocaust Remembrance Day has been observed in Aotearoa New Zealand since 2008. Over the years it has been attended by Holocaust Survivors, the Governor-General, the Prime Minister, and Ministers and Members of the New Zealand Parliament. Together with the Holocaust memorial sites and a Holocaust museum in Aotearoa New Zealand, this speaks to the importance we place on paying tribute to the memory of the victims of the Holocaust.

Aotearoa New Zealand is committed to safeguarding human rights, including the right to freedom of religion and belief and to realising the rights of minority populations worldwide. In becoming an Observer of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, we reiterate our commitment to promoting education, remembrance and research on the Holocaust to counter the influence of denial and distortion, hate speech and incitement to violence and hatred.

We thank the IHRA for accepting Aotearoa New Zealand as an Observer and look forward to working with the Alliance.

Source

Calls to boycott Doc Edge festival over Embassy of Israel funding

Palestinian human rights groups have called for a boycott of this year’s Academy Award-qualifying Doc Edge international documentary film festival over concern it’s funded by the Embassy of Israel.

Read more