The accepted western narrative on Palestine is false | Stuff

People carry the coffin of Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Aqleh who was killed during a raid of Israeli security forces in Jenin a few days ago, during her funeral at Jaffa Gate in Jerusalem’s Old City, May 13, 2022. Photo by Yonatan Sindel

The recent shooting of Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh ignited social networks and media outlets with accusations that Israel had committed a war crime by deliberately targeting the journalist.

Tragically, Abu Akleh was caught in the midst of a gunfight in an Israeli anti-terrorist operation in Jenin, a terrorist hot-bed. Israel has called for the Palestinian Authority to co-operate in an investigation, but the Palestinians are refusing to hand over evidence. In all likelihood, without Palestinian co-operation, the truth will never be known. However, that didn’t stop media outlets, Palestinian leaders and their supporters from repeating the unsubstantiated claim that Israel deliberately targeted her. [Editor’s note: Various reporting and analysis, such as by CNN and the Bellingcat Investigation Team, has concluded that Abu Akleh was most likely killed by Israeli forces.]

Mourners carry the coffin of slain Al Jazeera veteran journalist Shireen Abu Akleh during her funeral in Jerusalem on May 13. She was shot dead Wednesday during an Israeli military raid in the West Bank town of Jenin.
MAHMOUD ILLEAN/APMourners carry the coffin of slain Al Jazeera veteran journalist Shireen Abu Akleh during her funeral in Jerusalem on May 13. She was shot dead Wednesday during an Israeli military raid in the West Bank town of Jenin.

The background to the conflict in Jenin was the spate of terrorist attacks on Israeli citizens in the past two months. Nineteen civilians in Israel have been murdered in seven separate terrorist attacks since mid-March. The latest attack in Elad was a particularly brutal axe murder which took the lives of three men and left 16 children fatherless.

READ MORE:
Israel-Palestine Conflict: The media is ‘dehumanising’ the nation of Israel
No more Palestinian refugees!
The distorted Israeli lens on history
Shifra Horn: Palestinians spurning offers of peace
Graeme Carle: It’s a matter of simple justice

Did these deaths provoke an outpouring of rage and grief on social media? Were there calls for the images of the 19 murdered Israelis to be projected on public buildings? To the contrary, Palestinian social media was awash with celebratory posts, while Palestinian leaders praised the bravery of the terrorists and declared, “We will trample over the skulls of the Zionists; Israel will be annihilated”. While overseas leaders expressed sympathy for the murdered, New Zealand’s leaders and media were largely silent.

How is it that the world routinely turns a blind eye to the murder of Israelis? Partly, it’s due to a dominant narrative that posits Israel as a colonialist foreign occupying force that has progressively displaced an indigenous people through ethnic cleansing. However, this popular narrative bears little relationship to reality.

Jews are the indigenous people of the regions of Judea (Judea and Jew both derive from Judah, a son of Jacob/Israel) and Samaria, also known as the West Bank. It is in Israel that Jews had their ethnogenesis, developed their unique culture and maintained a continuous presence for more than 3000 years. This despite expulsions and dispossession at the hands of successive colonising powers.

An undated photo released by Al Jazeera of journalist Shireen Abu Akleh.
UNCREDITED/APAn undated photo released by Al Jazeera of journalist Shireen Abu Akleh.

In the 19th century Jews returned to their ancestral land in greater numbers and Europeans and Arab leaders alike recognised that the land belonged to the Jews. The British Mandate for Palestine came about in much the same way as Mandates for Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Yemen – each carved from the remnants of the Ottoman Empire, defeated in World War I.

Palestinians have recently commemorated Nakba which they argue was a “systematic transfer and replacement” of their people. However, for Israel, the war that broke out following the Declaration of Independence on 15 May 1948 was defensive and existential. Attacked by five Arab armies, the fledgling Jewish state fought for its life. Three years after the Holocaust, and during a period in which the world shut its doors to all but a few Jewish refugees, Israel had no other choice.

In contrast, the Arabs in British Mandate Palestine had options. The Arab Higher Command urged Arab inhabitants to flee to neighbouring states (in many cases their birthplaces or the homes of relatives), with the promise they could return once the Jews had been defeated. Or they could stay, as many chose to do, and become citizens of the new state. Today Arab Israelis serve in the highest levels of society.

Nor was the expulsion of approximately 850,000 Jews from Arab lands, where they’d lived for centuries, a systematic “transfer or replacement of Palestinians”. Jews in Arab lands were viciously beaten or murdered, banished from homes and forced to leave behind property. The new Jewish state absorbed all such refugees.

While the Palestinian narrative garners western support, it is a political construct based more on fantasy than fact. This narrative readily weds itself to classic anti-semitic tropes to demonise Israelis. In addition, religious ideology drives much of the hatred towards the Jewish state.

Sheree Trotter: “While the Palestinian narrative garners western support, it is a political construct based more on fantasy than fact.”
SUPPLIEDSheree Trotter: “While the Palestinian narrative garners western support, it is a political construct based more on fantasy than fact.”

The recent clashes at the Temple Mount were incited by Palestinian leaders claiming that Al Aqsa Mosque was under threat, a proven tactic for inciting the masses. The recent axe attack occurred after a Hamas leader called for Israelis to be killed with cleaver, axe, knife or gun. Many Palestinians are brought up with an ideology of Jew hatred pushed from childhood, through school curricula and in the mosques. Incentivisation to kill Jews in a pay-to-slay policy drives some to become martyrs.

The only peace they envision is one in which Israel ceases to exist – that is what “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” means. With Iranian-backed terrorist groups Hezbollah, to the north, and Hamas, to Israel’s south, and western commentators propagating a false Palestinian narrative, violence and contention look likely to continue.

Sheree Trotter co-founded the Indigenous Coalition for Israel last year, and the Holocaust and Anti-semitism Foundation in 2012.

Rubbish journalism: Stuff’s substandard reporting of Palmerston North protests | NZFOI

Protestors demand NZ Government to push for investigation of Al Jazeera reporter death

Yesterday, Stuff ran an article reporting a public protest in response to the death of Shireen Abu Akleh.

NZFOI considers the article a shockingly substandard piece of journalism.

According to the Media Council,

“An independent press plays a vital role in a democracy. The proper fulfilment of that role requires a fundamental responsibility to maintain high standards of accuracy, fairness and balance and public faith in those standards.”

Yet Heagney’s article falls short of this standard in three areas.

Accuracy: The article states that “She was shot by Israeli forces”. The matter is still under investigation by the authorities. Therefore, on what basis does the reporter make his statement? Nothing but hearsay.

Fairness: Heagney reports that his interviewee wants the New Zealand government to “push for an investigation.”But Heagney doesn’t mention the existence of other reports (e.g. Your Friday Briefing: The Fateful Bullet – The New York Times (nytimes.com)) saying that the Palestinian authorities had refused to allow Israeli investigators to examine the bullet removed from her body.

The truth is that there is no need for the NZ Government to push for an investigation because there is already an investigation underway and for unknown reasons, the Palestinian authorities were being obstructive and frustrating it.

Balance: Instead of presenting the full story, Heagney has written an article that provides no context, that does not inform readers of the long standing conflict between Israelis and Palestinians and by omission, implies that the protestors’ cause is free of bias and just.

On three counts, Heagney’s article falls short of the Media Council’s standards.

CNN’s Farce of an Investigation | CAMERA

Shireen Abu Akleh

CNN’s “investigation” of the death of Al Jazeera reporter Shireen Abu Akleh did not, as it claims, show that Israeli forces intentionally murdered her. Instead, CNN only showed the world how far the news company has fallen from serious journalism.

CNN’s incendiary accusation that Israel intentionally killed Abu Akleh builds assumptions on top of assumptions. It relies not so much on objective, incontrovertible evidence, but on the feelings of biased eyewitnesses. All the while, plausible alternative explanations are not only cast aside, but effectively covered up by CNN’s reporting.

These are the acts of a partisan organization, not a serious news agency.

Below are just some of the major shortcomings of the CNN “investigation.”

Read more

Pesach: Moses’ Question

Hag sameach!

By R Lord Jonathan Sacks

The first question Moses asked God was Mi anokhi.  Not “who are you?” But “who am I?”

At a simple level Moses was asking a simple question. Who am I to stand before Pharaoh? Who am I to lead the Jewish people? What makes me worthy of this task? Moses was already showing that aspect of his character that made him the unique leader he became. He was modest, “more humble”, as the Torah later states, “than anyone else on the face of the earth”. He had no sense of personal grandeur, no driving belief in his own destiny. He led not because he thought he was great but because the task was real, the need undeniable, the hour pressing and the call inescapable. He led because God left no choice other than to lead. He had, in Shakespeare’s words, greatness thrust upon him.

But at a deeper level Moses’ query was a different question. Who was Moses? How would a biographer have described him at that point? He was found and adopted by an Egyptian princess, raised in Pharaoh’s palace and brought up as an Egyptian Prince. When, after the events that led to his flight to Midian, he rescued Jethro’s daughters, the report to their father was, “an Egyptian rescued us.” In appearance, manner, dress, speech he was an Egyptian – not Hebrew, an Israelite, a Jew.

Moses’ question, therefore, cut to the core of identity. Perhaps it is a question asked in some form or another by every adopted child. Who am I? Am I the child of those who brought me up? Or am I the child of my biological parents, Amram and Jochabed? Am I an Egyptian or an Israelite? A prince or a slave? Where do my loyalties lie?

In Moses’ case it was no ordinary question. The implications were vast. Was he one of the rulers or the ruled? One of the powerful or powerless? Did he belong to the prosecutors or the persecuted? The alternatives could not have been more extreme. Before him later, on the one hand, a life of ease and honour; on the other, an uncertain fate fraught with suffering and pain.

Nor was it made easier by Moses’ first experience of the Jewish people. Intervening to save one of them from the brutality of an Egyptian taskmaster, the next day he found himself pilloried by the very people to his defence he had come. The first recorded words spoken to Moses by an Israelite were, “who made you ruler and judge over us?” Not yet a leader, he already found his leadership being challenged. It was the first intimation of what was to become a recurring theme of the Mosaic books. The Jewish people is not an easy people.

Perhaps Moses thought he could avoid the question. His flight to Midian was an escape from physical danger. He had killed an Egyptian officer. He faced a capital charge and a warrant was out for his arrest. But it was also an escape from the psychological burden of choice. Midian was neutral space. In Midian you do not have to decide whether you are an Egyptian or an Israelite. Moses was simply – as he said at the birth of his first child – “a stranger in a strange land.” Not an Egyptian or an Israelite but an outsider, someone who could have been either, whose origins were obscure but perhaps no longer relevant.

What Moses discovered, alone with his flocks of the mountain, was that there are choices from which we cannot hide. Almost the first words God says to him are, “I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob.” God is not here telling Moses who God is. The answer to that question comes later, in one of the most haunting, enigmatic statements and religious literature: Ehyeh asher Ehyeh, “I am who I am.” Or, “I will be who I will be.” In his earlier speech God is not telling Moses who God is but who Moses is. He is the son of his father, the descendant of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. He is not a prince of Egypt child of Israel. And being a child of Israel, he cannot, may not, be indifferent to their fate.

In a very real sense, Moses is a symbol of our time. New Zealand is our Midian – a place untouched by the tyranny of the Holocaust, the Egypt of the 20th century. Midian is somewhere else, neutral space, where the question of identity is no longer so pressing, where in the fullness of time a Jew can forget that he or she is a Jew.

Can we? Can we forget and still be honest with ourselves? Today, in an age of post-modernism and deconstruction, there is an assumption that identity is no longer fixed, absolute, given. We can be whatever we choose to be, and for however long or short a time. Cultures are no longer monolithic. We inhabit diversity. We can try out any of the world’s literatures or cuisines or faiths. Already through the Internet – the so-called multi-user domains – we can embark on a series of relationships in fictitious or simulated roles. Virtual reality will make this an even more convincing experience. Post-modern identities, Michel Foucault argued, are not discovered but invented. We are who we decide to be.

But there comes a moment for each of us, as it did for Moses, when the question of Mi anokhi, “who am I?” Is inescapable. There is only one answer. Imagine Moses, having asked the question, hearing the following words by way of reply: “You are whoever you choose to be. You can be an Egyptian and live the life of a prince. You can be a Midianite and spend the rest of your days as a shepherd, untroubled and obscure. You can be an Israelite in exile, dreaming distant dreams. Or you can go back to Egypt and take your place among the slaves. Feel free to choose. Remember: nothing matters except what you want. Don’t let me influence you in any way.”

We know, without having to be told, that this cannot be the voice of God. It is the voice of fantasy, in which nothing exists except our desires. Increasingly we are building a cultural fantasy. Reality is not fantasy. It is that which exists regardless of our choices. Objects are real because they impede our movement. People are real because they have wills of their own. Reality is the world we did not choose to enter. And we discover our place in it, ultimately, by learning who did choose that we should enter it, and why; by reflecting on who our parents are, and where they came from, and what their story is.

That is why Jewish identity is a given at birth – and why Pesach is the oldest and most profound answer to Moses’ question, “who am I?” For I learned who I am by hearing my ancestors’ story and knowing that I am one of its characters. I enter it midway, and whatever I choose will itself be part of that story, and I can opt out of it only at the cost of being false to my past and to myself.

That is the fundamental significance of the Haggadah, and why the seder service begins with questions asked by the child. On the surface, the Haggadah answers the question, “what is this?” What is Pesach, matzoh and maror? But beneath the surface the real question is, “who am I?” The greatest gift we can give our children is to tell them the story of where we came from and who our ancestors were. For we discover who we are, not by an outward journey into the culture and society that surrounds us, but by an inward journey into who gave us birth, and who bore them, and what happened to them to make them what they were.

God gave Moses his identity when he told him that he was a child of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. The story was his, and the time had come to write a new chapter. In that – no less – is what we give our children on Pesach. “This is your people and it story. Take it and make it yours. A hundred generations have each added their chapter. And there is one which bears your name, and only you can write. This is the past which you are the future. This is who you are.”

Source

Antisemitism Survey of New Zealand 2021 report released

Media Release

Wednesday 30 March 2022

Known as the oldest form of racism, a new study about the views of New Zealanders towards Jewish people shows concerning levels of antisemitism in Aotearoa New Zealand today.

The Antisemitism Survey of New Zealand 2021 was conducted by Curia Research and put 18 internationally recognised statements to just over one thousand New Zealanders to measure antisemitism sentiment.

It found that 63% of New Zealanders agree with at least one antisemitic view and 6% hold nine or more antisemitic views out of the 18 questions posed to quantify antisemitic views.

Former New Zealand Chief Science Advisor Sir Peter Gluckman wrote the foreword for the survey which follows a sharp rise in antisemitic incidents in New Zealand in the past few years.

“This survey shows that classic antisemitism has re-emerged – particularly during the pandemic – as Holocaust denial and has become conflated with conspiracy theories and alt-right politics.

“Another recent trend is the global emergence of left wing antisemitism. While most forms of discrimination are unacceptable in progressive thinking, antisemitism does not seem to count as racism because Jews can be accused of ‘white privilege’ and hatred can be hidden under a cloak of Zionophobia, or anti-Israel sentiment.

“History tells us that whenever societal cohesion breaks down or is at risk, antisemitic attitudes, memes and actions soon surface,” Sir Peter Gluckman says.

The survey was undertaken on behalf of the New Zealand Jewish Council with funding from the Ministry of Ethnic Communities.  

Jewish Council spokesperson Juliet Moses says it shows some New Zealanders still believe in stubborn and dangerous myths, or tropes, about Jewish people.

“About one in five New Zealanders, or 17%, believe Jews have too much power in international financial markets, and one in 10 believe Jews have too much control over the global media.

“This survey is an important tool in exposing these alarming beliefs. These falsehoods make Jewish communities a target when people are looking to lay blame for tough times.

“History has taught us this hatred doesn’t stop at Jewish communities. It spreads to other ethnic communities,” Juliet Moses says.

The survey also asked about New Zealanders’ understanding of what occurred during the Holocaust.

Of those surveyed only 42% could correctly identify that six million Jewish people were killed in the Holocaust. One fifth, or 17%, said they knew virtually nothing about the Holocaust.

Holocaust Centre of New Zealand chair Deborah Hart says the survey shows the need for Holocaust education.

“This survey represents the views of everyday New Zealanders. We recently saw an extreme side of this lack of understanding in the gross misuse of Holocaust references at the protest at Parliament.

“If people understand what the Holocaust actually was, it is a significant buffer against the rise of antisemitism and other forms of racism that can lead to genocide.  Holocaust education is a safeguard for civil society. Deborah Hart says.

Wellington Jewish Council chair and one of the founders of the National Interfaith Forums, David Zwartz, says the survey offers a solution to racism.

“Perhaps unsurprisingly, it found that warmth towards ethnic and religious groups increases when people personally know a member of that community.

“The simplest way to fight racism is to get to know each other, and do things together. When communities understand each other, they build trust and are able to put their judgements aside. They can embrace their similarities as well as their differences.

Juliet Moses says the Jewish Council thanks the Ministry for Ethnic Communities for their support, pointing out that such a survey has important lessons for all Aotearoa New Zealand’s minority ethnic and religious communities, not just the Jews.

“Many New Zealanders may be surprised to learn the Muslim and Jewish communities have had a close relationship for many years and the 2019 Mosque attacks brought us even closer together. Trust and understanding are the most powerful antidotes to racism,” Juliet Moses says.

Background information:

  • The New Zealand Jewish Council is the representative body of Jewish communities in New Zealand. There are congregations in Auckland, Waikato, Wellington, Nelson, Christchurch and Dunedin. There are approximately 10,000 Jews in New Zealand with the largest population in Auckland followed by Wellington.
  • The New Zealand Jewish community works with a number of other ethnic and faith communities including the Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand, the Bahá’í Faith of New Zealand and through interfaith forums.
  • The New Zealand Jewish Council is working closely with the Government on its social cohesion programme in response to the Royal Commission into the Mosque Attacks.
  • The Holocaust Centre of New Zealand is the country’s national Holocaust education and remembrance centre. It inspires and empowers action against antisemitism, discrimination, and apathy by remembering, educating, and bearing witness to the Holocaust.
  • A copy of the Antisemitism Survey of New Zealand 2021 report can be found at www.nzjc.org.nz/AntisemitismNewZealand2021.pdf

Media contact: Danya Levy 021 996 010

Regulating the Lulav | Tablet Mag

After Sukkot ends, most Orthodox Jews keep their lulavs in storage until six months later; there is a custom to use the dried-out lulav as kindling on the eve of Passover, when Jews burn all their leftover leavened products. However, in one tiny Jewish community this has never been the custom. In New Zealand, as soon as Sukkot is finished, all lulavs and etrogs are surrendered to the Ministry for Primary Industries, where they are destroyed with liquid nitrogen.

New Zealand has some of the tightest biosecurity laws in the world. There are huge signs at the airport noting that upon arrival, one must declare the presence of any organic material that is brought into the country: seeds, food, animal byproducts—even an apple you packed for the flight. Bringing any organic material into the country without declaring its presence and obtaining permission can result in serious fines, or in severe cases, even jail.

Read more

New Zealand, Cyprus to also boycott Durban IV conference | JPost

Arguments erupt outside the UN at the Durban IV Conference

New Zealand and Cyprus are the latest countries added to the list of those that will not take part in this month’s event marking 20 years since the World Conference Against Racism in Durban, which identified Israel alone as a racist state.

The conference was studded with anti-Semitic and anti-Israel sentiments.“

New Zealand remains strongly committed to combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance,” a spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade in Wellington said on Thursday.

“Consistent with our long-standing position, New Zealand will not attend the 20th anniversary of the Durban Declaration conference in New York on 22 September 2021.”

Durban IV will be held on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York.

Read more

FBI report reinforces trend that American Jews are ‘top target’ for hate crimes | JNS

The latest FBI report on hate crimes shows that the number of incidents continues to rise year to year in the U.S., with 7,759 hate crimes reported in 2020 as compared to 7,517 in 2019, but with fewer crimes categorized as “religiously motivated.”

Anti-Jewish bias accounted for 676 incidents — 57 percent of the 1,174 religiously motivated hate crimes in 2020 — aligning with the annual finding that the Jewish community is disproportionately targeted by religiously motivated crimes, given that Jews account for less than 2 percent of the U.S. population. The total number of incidents is down from the 953 anti-Jewish hate crimes reported in 2019, but also occurred a time of national lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read more

Ed Asner, proudly Jewish actor who won Emmys as Lou Grant and delighted in Pixar’s ‘Up,’ dies at 91 | JTA

Ed Asner

Ed Asner, the Emmy award-winning Jewish actor who trademarked a gruff, flawed, and loving persona as Lou Grant in “The Mary Tyler Moore Show” and co-starred in the Pixar fan favorite animated movie “Up,” has died at 91.

“We are sorry to say that our beloved patriarch passed away this morning peacefully,” the family said Sunday on Asner’s Twitter account. “Words cannot express the sadness we feel. With a kiss on your head — Goodnight dad. We love you.”

Asner, who once told The Forward he was “too much of a Jewish bourgeoisie” to play conventional roles, was an established character actor when he signed on in 1970 to “The Mary Tyler Moore” show to play her boss at a local TV news operation in Minneapolis.

Read more

Reckoning with the Nazi past of the man who helped build Mt Hutt skifield | Stuff

Mr and Mrs Willi and Edna Huber

We may never know the full truth about Huber’s four years in the service of the Nazi regime. But, while some secrets die hard, the truth sometimes has a way of coming to the surface.

In Autumn 1943, Soviet journalist Vasily Grossman saw mass graves in the areas of Eastern Europe where Huber served and where Nazi death squads murdered millions of Jews.

‘The earth is throwing out crushed bones, teeth, clothes, papers,’’ Grossman wrote.

“It does not want to keep secrets.”

Read more