Queenstown Mirror: Survivor Speaks About Holocaust

Fea, Sue

Sue Fea, Queenstown Mirror

SURVIVOR SPEAKS ABOUT HOLOCAUST

BY SUE FEA

QUEENSTOWN MIRROR, AUGUST 6, 2014

As a Jewish child he survived the Holocaust and now Lithuanian born Daniel Gold carries a tale of terror around the world, teaching the younger generation about the devastating consequences of racism.

Mr Gold in his late 70s will speak at a public meeting at St Margaret’s Presbyterian Church in Frankton tomorrow night at 7.30pm for a gold coin donation. He’ll also speak to students at Wakatipu High School on Friday.

Queenstown “Friends of Israel” coordinator Conny Vangronsvelt said, Mr Gold was hidden by his parents in 1943 during World War II when “actions” were carried out in the ghettos around Lithuania.

“All the old and weak people and children, were rounded up and sent to their deaths,” she said. “Parents tired to hide their children, but only a few remained undetected. Daniel and a few of his cousins were among them.”

She said the present unrest in Europe and on the Gaza Strip shows that the world has not learned the lesson about ethnic intolerance yet.

“Anti-Semitism is on the rise – it’s not extinct,” Mrs Vangronsvelt, a non-Jewish German who has lived in Israel said.

“There are daily demonstrations going on in Germany carrying terrible slogans like, “Hitler didn’t finish the job.””

“We have Israeli and Jewish friends who own shops in Israel, and whenever there’s a demonstration the police tell them to cover their windows,” she said.

Mr Gold’s tour, which takes in schools and universities in Auckland, Wellington Christchurch and Queenstown, is being organised by the Zionist Federation of New Zealand and New Zealand Friends of Israel. It’s his first visit to New Zealand and if time allows he may also speak at Cromwell College, Mrs Vangronsvelt said.

A professor of medical microbiology, Mr Gold who lives in Israel, retired eight years ago, but continues to teach medical students voluntarily.

One of the few remaining survivors of the Holocaust, Mrs Vangronsvelt said his mission was to teach history students and young people around the world about the Holocaust, bringing history books alive with his powerful firsthand account.

“He’s very passionate about communicating to the next generation about racism and prejudice.”

While in the Wakatipu he will officially open the travelling “Shadows of Shoah” Holocaust exhibition at Lakes District Museum on August 8.

  • Anyone interested in attending the invitation only opening should contact the museum on 442 1824.

NZFOI Public Statement on the Israel-Gaza Conflict July-August 2014

Gaza-RocketNZFOI’S PUBLIC STATEMENT ON THE ISRAEL-GAZA CONFLICT JULY-AUGUST 2014

AUGUST 5, 2014

New Zealand Friends of Israel (NZFOI) is horrified by the parade of wounded, dying or dead Palestinian women and children across our television screens since the beginning of the latest war in Gaza.

We are appalled  that the death of three Israeli teenagers and 1 Arab teenager should spiral so quickly into full blown war.  NZFOI is deeply concerned by reports that Hamas is illegally using civilians as human shields.

We are disturbed that Hamas has been storing munitions in UN schools and carrying out operations from within hospitals.  The suffering of civilians and the loss of their homes is heart rending.

On the other hand, the barrage of rockets indiscriminately being fired into Israel must be stopped.  Though relatively ineffective against Israel’s defences, they are nonetheless deadly if they are allowed to reach their intended targets.

We understand that Israel must do what it must to stop the barrage of rockets and to prevent terrorist incursions using underground tunnels to cross the border.

Urban warfare will result in civilian casualties and that the historical ratio of civilian to combatant casualties in all conflicts around the world since WW2 is near 3:1.  As yet we do not know what the final ratio might be in Gaza, but we urge everyone to be slow in jumping to conclusions.

In time of war, all news coming from a war zone can be and often is subject to censorship. Only pictures of civilian casualties are emerging from Hamas controlled Gaza.  All civilian deaths in Gaza are being attributed to Israel.

This is not the full picture.  This conflict is not just a war of physical violence but also a manipulative war for hearts and minds.

We are also sickened that pro-Palestinian rallies around the world have sparked many anti-Semitic acts.  Slogans rarely heard since Nazism held power, are being openly chanted.

Synagogues and Jewish stores have been attacked.  Jews have been beaten in the streets.  Jews once more are afraid of being seen in public.

The world has not learnt from the Holocaust.

Our thoughts and prayers are with all those who have been wounded or have suffered the loss of a loved one through this conflict. We pray that it will draw to a swift and peaceful conclusion.

ABOUT THE SOCIETY

NZFOI was formed in 1974.  It fights racial and ethnic intolerance by raising awareness of Jewish history and culture, www.nzfoi.org.

STATEMENT ENDS

Where is the outrage?

Gaza-RocketBy Arsen Ostrovsky

Published in the Telegraph

8 July 2014

You see, as most people in the UK were waking up this morning, and those in Europe, United States and elsewhere around the world were going about their daily routines, here in Israel over one million people were running for cover from a hail of rockets being rained down by Palestinian Hamas terrorists in Gaza.

In the last 24 hours alone, over 120 rockets have been fired on southern Israel. That’s approximately five rockets per hour. By the time I finish this article, odds are that count will have risen to 125 rockets.

To put things in context: one million Israelis is roughly 13 per cent of the population. Thirteen per cent of the UK population equates to about 8.4 million people, or the entire population of London.

A number of Israelis have already been injured, though thankfully without fatalities. The only reason more have not been hurt is because Israel has invested millions of dollars in bomb shelters and the Iron Dome defence system. Meanwhile, Hamas, whose very raison d’être is the destruction of Israel and which is recognised as a terrorist organisation both by the EU and UK, has invested millions of dollars in foreign aid into more rockets.

So, where is the outrage?

Since the beginning of this year, Gaza terrorists have fired more than 450 rockets on Israel, with about half of them coming since mid-June, when two Hamas terrorists kidnapped and brutally murdered three Israeli teenagers.

Why is it that a majority of the international community only notices when Israel undertakes its sovereign right, and obligation, to defend its citizens? Can you imagine if even one rocket was fired on London, Washington, Paris or Moscow? This is simply intolerable and no country can, or should, tolerate such attacks on its people.

Where is the outrage from the United Nations, which does not hesitate for a moment to call a “special emergency session” on the “Question of Palestine” or pass the umpteenth resolution blindly condemning Israel? But 24 hours after the rocket attacks on Israel started, I am still waiting for even one syllable of condemnation from the UN Security Council, the UN General Assembly or the Human Rights Council.

Read more.

Hidden Child: Daniel Gold tour August 2014

Daniel Gold

Daniel Gold with his father shortly after WWII

Over the last 3 years NZ Friends of Israel has collaborated with the Jewish Federation of New Zealand to bring Holocaust survivors to speak to New Zealand High School students.

Work is well underway on this year’s tour.

Professor Daniel Gold is this year’s Holocaust survivor.

Daniel Gold was born in Šiauliai, Lithuania in 1937. In 1941, the Germans occupied Lithuania, and the Jews of Šiauliai were enclosed in a ghetto. In 1943, “Aktions” were carried out in all the ghettos aroundLithuania. All the old and weak people, and also the children were rounded up and sent to their deaths. Parents tried to hide the children, but only a very few remained undetected. Among them were Daniel and few of his cousins. In the summer of 1944, just a few days prior to the liquidation of the ghetto and the dispatch of all survivors to concentration camps, his aunt and uncle escaped, taking with them their two sons, another cousin and Daniel. They found refuge with a Lithuanian peasant family, where they lived in hiding, under extremely cramped conditions, until their liberation by the Russian army in late fall of 1944. In 1946, Daniel was reunited with his father in Germany after his father was liberated from Dachau concentration camp by the American army in 1945. Daniel’s mother perished.

In 1952, Daniel and his father left Europe for Israel. There, Daniel’s life story took a remarkable turn. He served in the Israeli Air Force as a pilot during the Six Day War, the War of Attrition, the Yom Kippur War, and the first Lebanon War. He served as a reserve pilot for several decades. At a later stage in his life, Daniel joined the academia, attaining the position of a Professor of Medical Microbiology. Although retired for the last eight years, he continues to teach medical students on a voluntary basis. Likewise, he also served voluntarily for several at the Israeli police as a traffic policeman

Booking

Daniel will visit schools in your region and address students between Wednesday August 6 until Thursday August 28.

Please find below the datesthat Daniel will be visiting your area:

Auckland: 6-7 August

Queenstown: 7-8 August

Christchurch: 10-11 August

Dunedin: 12-13 August

To book please contact

Idit Forester
office@jfnz.org.nz
Ph (09) 529 5549

We suggest you allow 45 minutes for Daniel to address your students and an additional half an hour for questions and discussion time.  We are flexible and will do our best to suit your schedule.

We encourage schools within local regions to liaise with other nearby schools in a central auditorium in a school or alternative venue in your area.  If you are planning to do this, let us know and we can put you in touch with other interested schools who may be able to join you.

Cost: $4 per student plus a booking fee of $25 booking fee per school.  A minimum of $75 per session (including booking fee).  Limited sponsorship is available for those students who are unable to meet this cost.

Your venue will need to have a PA system and facilities for projecting a PowerPoint slideshow.

Bringing a survivor from Israel involves significant costs, if you are able to financially support the project make a donation using PayPal: contact@nzfoi.org or contact us directly via email on the same address.

 

 

 

Just Dance!

Every two years, Aotearoa’s capital city plays host to the New Zealand Festival.  Promoted as a spectacle of culture and arts for “explorers and dreamers,” this year’s extravangaza was rather unfairly sidelined by a small political protest.

John Minto

John Minto

As part of the so-called “BDS” (Boycott, Divestments and Sactions) movement agianst Israel, the country’s most prominent protestor, John Minto, once again rounded up his rent-a-mob troops to protest the involvement of Israel’s renowned Batsheva Dance Company in the festival.

Minto and his cohorts first demanded the government deny members of the dance company visas to the country.  In well publicised letters to Foreign Minister Murray McCully and Immigration Minister Michael Woodhouse, the group urged that they provide “practical solidarity to the Palestinian struggle” by refusing them.

The group insisted this action was required for New Zealand to fulfil its “obligations” to the Palestinians under international law. “Such a decision will be welcomed by Palestinians as part of the international pressure to bring change to the policies of the Israeli apartheid state as well as by those countries thinking supporting New Zealand’s bid for a UN Security Council seat,” the letter said.

In a widely reported decision, McCully announced the company would not be refused visas. Noting the government pursues “a balanced and constructive approach to the Israel-Palestinian issue,” he said that “the Batsheva Dance Company is made up of dancers from around the world and is coming to New Zealand as part of a wider Australasian tour.”

Not to be denied his time in the spotlight, Minto, who last year unsuccessfully ran for the Auckland mayoralty, then organised a protest outside the Batsheva Dance Company’s Saturday night performance.

Ultimately, this resulted in about 40 anti-Israel protesters facing off against a slightly larger counter-demonstration organised by Wellington Jewish community leader David Zwartz. Extensive publicity was generated by, and afforded to, Minto’s small protest.

Local media, long in thrall to Minto’s ability to generate headlines and outrage among the general public, probably paid the anti-Batsheva campaign and eventual protest more attention than the numbers warranted.

However, to the eyes of this observer, there was something a bit different and positive about the coverage of the anti-Batsheva campaign compared to  past efforts by Minto and his pro-BDS comrades. That difference was the coverage given to the counter-demonstration in views opposed to those of the anti-Israel activists.

When McCully refused to deny visas to the dance company it was reported. When Zwartz said the allegations that Israel was an apartheid state were racist and unfounded it was reported. When the Auckland Jewish Council co-Chairs described the anti-Batsheva campaign as “a cheap publicity stunt that should be exposed for its sinister agenda” it was reported.

Apart from the less mainstream media — like Scoop and a number of blogs, all of which have always tended towards a pro-Palestinian bias, local media reported both sides of the story. The STUFF website even published a review of the Batsheva show.

Comments from Batsheva’s artistic director, Ohad Naharin, were also widely reported. Naharin said he was “disappointed to see a group of intelligent people wasting their money and their energy on something that won’t result in anything.”

He told local media he had experienced this kind of “impotent activity” for years. “The situation in the West Bank is tragic and indeed every effort must be made to change it. If I believe that boycotting our performances could bring any progress in ending the occupation, I would join the boycott myself.”

In an article in the National Business Review journalist John Daly-Peoples went even further. He compared the anti-Batsheva campaign to the “spirit of Nazi Germany” and said the pro-Palestinian activists would be “using the same harassment techniques used by the Nazis to close down Jewish and liberal performances in the 1980s.”

The boycotting of cultural event is misguided, Daly-Peoples seed. “As it is cultural activities, such as Darren Barenboim’s West-Eastern Divan Orchestra, which have promoted active dialogue and been one of the significant ways in which the Israelis and the Palestinians have made some reconciliation.”

He also pointed out that the “myopic approach to boycotting lets the Russians off the hook… despite them funding the play A Midsummer’s Nights Dream, also on during the festival, and despite the country’s stand on gay rights and their support of the Assad regime which is undermining the Palestinian cause.”

While Minto in his acolytes claim success — on the somewhat spurious grounds that five people bailed up by his protest said they decided not to attend the performance — this seems closer to wishful thinking than to reality.

It is hard to know what the reasonably measured response of the media and the general public to this particular campaign might mean in the broader scheme of things.

However, it seems that the views of the Festival’s Executive Director, Sue Paterson, that festival shows should be selected solely on the basis of artistic merit was the primary winner in this saga.

Source:  Miriam Bell, Australian-Israeli Review, April 2014.

Anti-Semitism has “exploded” in Latin America

Sammy Eppel, activist and director of The Commission for Human Rights at B’nai B’rith Venezuela, said on Monday that anti-Semitism in Latin America has significantly increased in recent years.

“The problem is that there is big damage that has been done in the last 12, 10  years,” he said. “I was born in Venezuela and I lived there all my life and I never felt anti-Semitism from anybody… we were never discriminated and all of a sudden in 2004, it explodes.”

Eppel made his comments as a panelist at a special conference held at the United Nations in honor of Holocaust Remembrance Day.

In 2006, he said, the Venezuelan Jewish community had to open an office and hire five professionals to monitor anti-Semitism in government and government-sponsored media.

In April 2011, while former Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez was in Cuba undergoing treatment for various health problems, a correspondent for Venezuela’s national radio, Radio Nacional de Venezuela, did a series of programs promoting the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The book, which is the second most printed publication in the Arab world after the Koran, describes a popular anti-Semitic notion that the Jewish people are planning global domination. The book is also available at book fairs in Venezuela promoted by the government, Eppel added.

“I’d never heard of the Protocols before 15 years ago. You couldn’t find it in Latin America before. Now, you see it all over the place,” he said. “It’s official literature for [Arab] schools, for their people…When they come to Latin America, they bring it with them.”

Eppel explained that while Venezuelan President Maduro, elected in 2013, pledged that he will not allow anti-Semitic behavior in his country, the damage has already been done in many areas. Hatred toward Jews has even seeped into Venezuela’s government.

“Why would a politician be demonized or be deemed not fit for public office for the fact of being Jewish? That’s anti-Semitism. That’s discrimination,” said Eppel, who is also a political analyst and journalist. “In Venezuela it happened that a Catholic, a practicing Catholic, he happened to have two Jewish grandparents, and because of that he was disqualified. I mean that’s very nasty stuff.”

The discrimination is prevalent across Latin America. Eppel pointed out that less than a month ago, on Good Friday, Madrid’s ABC ran an op-ed claiming that during Holy Week, Jews would kill Christian children, and extract their blood to make matzahs for Passover. Eppel expressed frustration over the limited response it received.

“You would think that the entire country of Spain would’ve risen to condemn this. Nobody did,” he said.

Eppel also stressed that “one of the big disturbances” in Latin America is Iran’s activism in the region as it works to spread its radical and anti-Semitic ideology.

The Islamic Republic operates a television station in Spanish that “spews venom” about Jews, according to Eppel. They are also taking over Arab and Christian institutions in Latin America and converting them into anti-Semitic establishments, he said.

“There seems to be a marriage between the extreme right, represented  by the Iranians and their Fascist type… of government, and the extreme left,” he said about Iran’s relations in Latin America. “They got together and said ‘well, the only thing that we all agree is that we have to bash Israel, we have to bash Zionism and we have to bash the Jews.’ ”

In Latin America, many terrorist groups are seen as ‘resistance movements’ and their members are identified as ‘freedom fighters,’ and are therefore recipients of aid.

The Latin American Parliament has adopted a comprehensive declaration against anti-Semitism, and Eppel hopes it becomes law one day. He called for government action in the form of legislation, to ensure that discrimination against Jews does not continue to expand in the region.

“I believe that the only answer to this situation is education and legislation,” he said. “After you enact the legislation, you have to train the police, you have to train the district attorneys, the judges to actually recognize that crime and how to prosecute it and how to go about it. That’s why legislation is important.”

“If we don’t have those two things – education and legislation – we are not going to succeed, at least in Latin America.”

Source:  Algemeiner:  May 1, 2014

The Fatah-Hamas Agreement

Gaza-RocketThere is the criminal failure of the international community, as both accomplice and accessory before the fact, to make any meaningful effort to prevent endless salvoes of terrorist rocket attacks against Israeli civilians for over nine years.

As we saw with the Iranian arms shipment aboard the Klos-C last month, Iran’s sponsorship of terrorism continues unabated — even as the international community is rehabilitating its extremist regime.

Three hundred and thirty two drone attacks against Al Qaida and Taliban targets on Pakistani territory since 2005 demonstrate U.S. President Barack Obama’s strong resolve against terrorists that threaten the United States. Only last week, the latest wave of air strikes launched or enabled by his government against Al Qaida networks in Yemen killed 55 suspected extremists, possibly including master bomb-maker Ibrahim al-Asiri.

Of course no one expects the U.S. to send drones in reply to the news that the Palestinian Authority [PA], upon which he has lavished billions of dollars and thousands of hours of diplomacy, was going into business with Hamas, which the United States has branded a terrorist organization.

But one could hope for something more forceful from Washington than State Department spokesman Jen Psaki’s weak and vacillating response in which she attempted to take the heat off Hamas and the PA by taking a gratuitous dig at Israel. “There have been unhelpful steps from both sides throughout this process,” she said.

If the US response was feeble, the EU’s was treacherous.

Like America and several other countries, the EU designates Hamas as a terrorist organization. Yet the spokesman for Catherine Ashton, EU foreign affairs head, actually welcomed the proposal to bring Hamas into the PA.

Though shameful, this is far from surprising. It is part of a lengthy pattern of witting or unwitting EU encouragement of Middle Eastern terrorism.

The EU has contributed its taxpayers’ money to paying the salaries of convicted Palestinian terrorists via unconditional donations to the PA amounting to billions of dollars since 1994. Some of this money has also been spent on school textbooks, television programs and other PA propaganda that incite hatred and terrorism against Israel.

Ashton and the EU have called repeatedly for an end to the Israeli-Egyptian security operation on land and sea around Gaza. The operation is designed to prevent predominantly Iranian-supplied munitions and materiel for terrorism from entering the Gaza Strip, and to stop Gaza terrorists and weapons moving to attack Israeli or Egyptian targets.

At the same time, the EU, like the UN, has usually remained mute in the face of volley after volley of Iranian-supported rocket attacks from Gaza directed against the civilian population of Israel. These rockets are fired mainly by Hamas and their terrorist bedfellows, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Silence and inaction by such significant international bodies as the UN and the EU must, in these circumstances, add up to at least a degree of culpability.

Robert Serry, the UN Special Coordinator for the Peace Process, seems to have swallowed Abbas’s suggestion to him that reconciliation with Hamas will be on the basis of “recognition of Israel, non-violence and adherence to previous agreements.” On that “understanding,” the UN, like the EU, apparently welcomes and even supports the prospect of a terrorist group’s incorporation into the PA.

Were Hamas indeed to commit — plausibly — to such undertakings, then Israel could of course continue peace negotiations and cooperation with the PA on current terms. But other than Abbas’s words to Serry, there is no indication of this and, in the real world, Hamas is not likely even to consider such conditions.

Prime Minister Netanyahu therefore had no choice other than to suspend the peace process. This was his obligation to the Israeli people and to the international community. How could he possibly continue to negotiate with an entity that is itself negotiating with a vicious, murderous and unrelenting terrorist group hell-bent on the destruction of Israel and outlawed around the world?

Of course Abbas knew full well when he agreed to unity with Hamas that this would end the peace negotiations. But this is only the latest in a series of steps that Abbas has taken to sabotage the peace process. He rejected U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry’s framework principles last month; he has repeatedly refused to discuss PA recognition of Israel as the national homeland of the Jewish people; and at the end of March he initiated a move to join 15 international organizations, contravening an agreement to make no unilateral moves in the international arena during the period of the peace negotiations.

One of the greatest challenges in the peace process, should it be resumed at some point, is resolving Israel’s security concerns in the West Bank. Since the Israel Defense Forces left Gaza in 2005, Palestinians have fired into Israel over 8,000 rockets, killing 44 Israelis and injuring more than 1,600.

A damaged apartment building in Ashdod, following a direct hit by a rocket fired from Gaza, in November 2012. (Image source: IDF)

In addition, Gaza terrorists have seized every available opportunity for other forms of attack against Israeli soldiers and civilians including kidnappings, shootings, suicide bombs, anti-tank missiles and Improvised Explosive Devices [IEDs].

Iran, sworn to Israel’s destruction, as are its Gaza-based proxies, has funded, armed, energized and directed both Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. As we saw with the Israeli interdiction of the Iranian arms shipment aboard the Klos-C only last month, Iran’s sponsorship of terrorism continues unabated — even as the international community is rehabilitating its extremist regime.

Especially in a region and among neighbours that are becoming even more unstable, violent and unpredictable, Israel must ensure that in the event a Palestinian state should ever reach fruition, the West Bank does not become a second Gaza. The bloody consequences of that for the Israeli people would be far greater than from anything Hamas could hurl out of the Strip.

Kerry has proposed international troops to provide security against attacks on Israel from the West Bank. Few Israelis believe that they could rely on such a force to protect them. There are the historical precedents for the failure of peacekeeping forces in the region and beyond, especially when the going gets tough. And in the West Bank, the going would get very tough very soon and very often.

There is the criminal failure of the international community, as both accomplice and accessory before the fact, to make any meaningful effort to prevent endless salvoes of lethal terrorist rocket attacks against Israeli civilians for over nine years.

Worse still, when Israel has been forced to respond to protect its citizens, it has been stabbed in the back by the international community, who have accused it of war crimes.

The UN’s ill-conceived and deeply flawed 2009 Goldstone Report, for example, amounted to nothing less than incitement to terrorism.

And then there is the spectacle that we have witnessed over the past few days, of the pusillanimous and equivocating international response to plans for an active and violent terrorist group to join the PA.

Confronted by world leaders who lack the moral courage to face down terrorists whom even they themselves have designated as such, Israel is entirely right in its assumption that when it comes to security it can rely only on its own moral strength and its own armed forces.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Colonel Richard Kemp spent most of his 30-year career in the British Army fighting terrorism and insurgency, including in Iraq, the Balkans, South Asia, and Northern Ireland. He was Commander of British Forces in Afghanistan in 2003. He was also involved in the direction of national policy at the highest level, working at the Joint Intelligence Committee and as a member of COBRA, the UK national crisis committee. He writes regularly for The Times and speaks worldwide on terrorism, international security and other issues.

SOURCE:  Gatestone Institute.

Recognising Reality: The debate over Israel as a “Jewish State”

JewishStateIsraeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s position that a permanent status agreement resulting in a two state solution must include explicit Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state is rejected by Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas, and is a key point of contention in the peace process.

For Netanyahu, and for most Israeli Jews, mutual recognition of Jewish and Palestinian national rights is integral to the logic of a lasting agreement based on two states for two peoples.

Most Israeli Jews wish to preserve Israel’s current character as a democratic state with a Jewish majority; a state that allows Jews to express the universal legal right to national self-determination, but which also protects fully the rights of non-Jewish minorities.
At the Davos Summit in January, US Secretary of State John Kerry said: “We all know what the endgame looks like: … mutual recognition of the nation-state of the Palestinian people and the nation-state of the Jewish people.”

 

Why is this an issue now?

Since accepting the principle of creating a sovereign Palestinian state in 2009, Binyamin Netanyahu has stressed that a permanent status agreement must include Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state. In a recent statement he clarified that he wanted the Palestinians to “recognise the national rights of the Jewish people in the State of Israel.” While stating that this must be part of the final agreement, at no point has Netanyahu made this a precondition for talks with the Palestinians.

PA President Mahmoud Abbas has taken a firm stance against this demand, creating a significant obstacle in John Kerry’s search for an agreed framework for continuing talks.

 

What do Israelis mean by a Jewish state?

For Netanyahu, and for most Israeli Jews, mutual recognition of Jewish and Palestinian national rights in the territory west of the Jordan River is integral to the logic of a lasting peace based on two states for two peoples.

Most Israeli Jews want to preserve Israel’s character as it is today, as both democratic and Jewish. Israel today is ‘Jewish’ in the sense that it has a Jewish majority, allows that majority to express the universal legal right to national self-determination, and is open to Jews who wish to immigrate. This is no different to most other states which express the right of the ethnic majority to self-determination, whilst still protecting the rights of minorities.

Reference to a ‘Jewish state’ does not mean a state based on religious precepts, or a state which discriminates against non-Jews.

All Israelis today – both the 75% Jewish majority and non-Jewish minorities – enjoy equal rights before the law and freedom of religion. Non-Jewish minorities enjoy collective rights in education, language and religion. Discrimination based on religious or ethnic identity is illegal.

To maintain Israel’s Jewish majority, and its character as the nation state of the Jewish people, Israel wants Palestinian refugee claims to be resolved through the creation of a Palestinian state.

 

Why are the Palestinians resistant to this idea?

Rejection of Jewish national rights – indeed rejection of the idea that the Jews constitute a distinct national group – is deeply rooted in the Palestinian-Arab narrative. It is linked to the belief that all of Palestine is rightfully an Arab territory and that Arab refugees from the 1948 war and their descendants should have the ‘right of return’ to territory now within Israel’s borders.

However, Palestinians have not always been so opposed to recognition of the Jewish state. The Palestinian declaration of independence in 1988 referenced the UN 1947 Partition Plan, which explicitly refers to the creation of a Jewish and an Arab state side by side.

When former US President Bill Clinton addressed the refugee issue in his parameters for a peace agreement in 2000, he noted Israel could not accept a right to immigrate that would “threaten the Jewish character of the state,” adding that, “A new State of Palestine is about to be created as the homeland of the Palestinian people, just as Israel was established as the homeland of the Jewish people.” The PLO’s detailed response raised no challenge to this basic principle.

In a June 2004 interview with Haaretz, the late PA President Yasser Arafat was asked explicitly whether he understood that “Israel has to keep being a Jewish state.” He responded, “Definitely, definitely, I told them we had accepted [this] openly and officially in 1988.”

However, since Netanyahu has raised the profile of the issue, the PA leadership has become very resistant. They claim not only that it prejudices Palestinian refugee claims but that Israel’s demand threatens minority rights in Israel, or involves asking Palestinians to renounce their identity or history. Israel rejects these latter two objections.

 

What have world leaders said?

Secretary of State John Kerry: “We all know what the endgame looks like: … mutual recognition of the nation-state of the Palestinian people and the nation-state of the Jewish people.”

US President Barack Obama: “Palestinians must recognise that Israel will be a Jewish state.”

German Chancellor Angela Merkel: “We in the federal government support a two-state solution – a Palestinian state and a Jewish state of Israel.”

French President François Hollande: “France’s position is known. It is that of a negotiated solution for the State of Israel and the State of Palestine – both with Jerusalem for a capital – can coexist in peace and security. Two States for two peoples.”

British Prime Minister David Cameron: “Britain has played a proud and vital role in helping to secure Israel as a homeland for the Jewish people… imagine, as John Kerry put it: ‘mutual recognition of the nation state of the Palestinian people and the nation state of the Jewish people.'”

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper: “We share with Israel a sincere hope that the Palestinian people and their leaders will choose a viable, democratic, Palestinian state, committed to living peacefully alongside the Jewish state of Israel … Our view on Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state is absolute and non-negotiable.”

 

What is the historical background?

• The founder of modern political Zionism Theodore Herzl helped launch the movement with a pamphlet published in 1896 entitled Der Judenstaat (“The State of the Jews”). Following many centuries of antisemitic persecution in Europe, he and most other Zionist leaders envisaged a secular, democratic, Jewish majority state in which non-Jews would live as full and equal citizens.

• The British government committed to support “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people” in the 1917 Balfour Declaration. This goal received international legal sanction under the League of Nations Mandate granted to Britain in 1922, which gave recognition to, “the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country.”

• In 1947 the United Nations General Assembly approved with a two thirds majority a plan to partition Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state. The proposal was accepted by the Jews but rejected by the Arabs, who then launched the 1947-48 Arab-Israeli War.

• Israel declared its independence on the basis of the UN resolution on May 1948. Israel’s first Prime Minister David Ben Gurion declared the establishment of: “A Jewish State in Eretz-Israel [the Land of Israel], to be known as the State of Israel,” which would ensure “complete equality of social and political rights to all its inhabitants.” The State of Israel was admitted to the United Nations in May 1949.

Source:  BICOM (British-Israel Communications and Research Centre)

Netanyahu: I will not negotiate with Hamas

CROWLEY: Joining me now is Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Mr. Prime Minister, as always, we thank you for being here.

I want to start with the fact that Israel is involved in its annual commemoration this day of the Holocaust. And in advance of that, Palestinian President Abbas issued a statement calling the Holocaust — and I quote here — “the most heinous crime in the modern era.” He expressed sympathies for the victims of the Holocaust.

What do you make of that?

BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER: Well, I try to reconcile that with the fact that he embraced just a few days ago the Hamas terrorist organization that denies the Holocaust and openly calls for a new extermination of the six million Jews in Israel.

So, President Abbas can’t have it both ways. He can’t say the Holocaust was terrible, but at the same time embrace those who deny the Holocaust and seek to perpetrate another destruction of the Jewish people.

I think probably what he’s trying to do is damage control. I think what President Abbas is trying to do is to placate Western public opinion that understands that he delivered a terrible blow to the peace process by embracing these Hamas terrorists. And I think he’s trying to wiggle his way out of it.

CROWLEY: He is also quoted in today’s “Jerusalem Post” as talking about this new unity government with Hamas, and saying: “The government reports to me and follows my policies. I recognize Israeli, and so will the government. I renounce violence and terrorism, and I recognize international legitimacy, and so will the government.”

So, essentially, he’s saying: This is still going to be my government. It still is going to follow what I have observed and what I have said.

What do you make of that, and do you believe him? And, if you do, is it enough to bring you back to the table?

NETANYAHU: Look, I will not, as the prime minister of Israel, negotiate with a government that is backed by the Hamas terror organization committed to our destruction.

Neither would you. You designate Hamas, the U.S., as a terrorist organization. It sends thousands of rockets into Israel. It sends scores of suicide bombers. It praised the murder of a father of five the other week on the way to a Passover dinner, praised it. They praised bin Laden when he was alive as a holy warrior and condemned the United States when you killed bin Laden.

This is one of the most preeminent terrorist organizations of our time. And, obviously, the U.S. abhors it, as we do. And nobody expects us to negotiate with a government that is backed by it.

Now, the statement that, well, I will put forward, even though I’m — I’m in national unity with Hamas, I’m putting forward in the front office more respectable people, we know that gambit. It’s the back office/front office gambit. In the back office, the mafia sits. In the front office, you have respectable lawyers.

We’re not going to buy that trick. We will not negotiate with a government backed by Hamas, unless Hamas had changed its position or unless Hamas said, oh, I’m willing to recognize Israel.

But Hamas, including after this pact with Abbas, is saying the very opposite. It’s saying, Israel is going to be destroyed; we will continue the terror campaign against Israel.

This is the partner that President Abbas has now joined. And I call on President Abbas, tear up your pact with Hamas. Recognize the Jewish state. Come back to a real peace process.

CROWLEY: One of the criticisms, Mr. Prime Minister, has been that, prior to this, when you were dealing with Abbas, you had said, look, I don’t know who I’m supposed to negotiate with. There’s Hamas and then there’s Abbas and Fatah.

So, now there’s a unity government, and you still don’t want to talk to them. So, there’s criticism here that this was an excuse for you to walk away.

NETANYAHU: Sorry, Candy. Whoa.

CROWLEY: Go ahead.

NETANYAHU: No, Candy. No, no. I’m sorry.

I heard that. I hear people write that up, but, in fact, it’s the very opposite. I said right from the start, I said, look, I could wait until President Abbas recognizes — represents the entire Palestinian people. But, in this case, we will wait until eternity, and we won’t have peace.

So, I chose deliberately, openly, specifically, and explicitly to negotiate with that part of the Palestinian people that said it was willing to make peace with Israel. I said, we’re not going to try to include the other part that seeks our extermination. And that’s what I did.

I have been very consistent on this. Now that he’s joined them, I say this. Look, unity for peace is good. Unity with Hamas that seeks to exterminate Israel, the opposite of peace, is bad. I have always been consistent on this.

I negotiate with those who are willing to make peace with my country. I will not negotiate with those who seek to exterminate peace with my country, whether they sit in the front office or the back office. That’s not where I’m going to go. CROWLEY: So, as I understand you, what you’re saying is: First, for me to come back to the table in any way, shape or form, Hamas or a representative — a top representative of Hamas would have to renounce violence and recognize Israel, or Abbas will have to not have a unity government.

Is that how I read you?

NETANYAHU: I think that’s a fair — that’s a fair summation.

Either Hamas disavows the destruction of Israel and embraces peace and denounces terror, or President Abbas renounces Hamas. If one of those things happens, then we can get back to the peace negotiations. I hope that he renounces Hamas. I hope that he gets back to the peace table, as I have just said.

CROWLEY: Do you need the United States…

NETANYAHU: The ball is in his court. It’s his decision.

CROWLEY: Do you need the United States to broker an ultimate deal?

NETANYAHU: I think the United States has been indispensable in all the peace negotiations that we have had up to now.

It doesn’t obviate the need for genuine, direct contact between the parties, but it can help a lot and I appreciate Secretary Kerry’s unbelievable efforts. They don’t always succeed. And, unfortunately, President Abbas made sure of that by embracing Hamas.

But I have to credit John Kerry for his efforts. I still hope that we will find a way to peace. You know, if we can’t get it through a negotiated agreement because of the composition of the Palestinian government, then we will seek other ways.

I’m not going to — I’m not going to accept a stalemate. I won’t accept a Palestinian state that is another Iranian offshoot of Iran firing missiles into our cities. This is what has happened with Hamas and Gaza. But I do seek a two-state-for-two-peoples solution. If I can’t have it right away with a Palestinian — this Palestinian government, then we will seek other ways.

I’m — I called on my cabinet ministers today, and I said, we’re going to take time out now for reassessment and try and figure out alternative paths to peace. But the simplest way to get back to the peace process is have President Abbas renounce the pact with Hamas and come back to negotiations.

CROWLEY: Mr. Prime Minister, finally, in September of 2012, you told me that you thought Iran was probably six to nine months away from being able to have full nuclear weapon capability. Where is it now?

NETANYAHU: I didn’t say weapon capability. I said nuclear- enriched material. CROWLEY: Nuclear-enriched, yes, sir.

NETANYAHU: That is fissile material for a bomb.

They’re about two months away. And they’d like — they’d like to be — to stay two months away. They have been under terrific sanctions pressure. There was an interim deal. Now they’re seeking a deal that would keep them more or less where they are. In other words, they will be a few months away — or they might be set back a few months from producing enough nuclear material for a bomb.

And, in exchange, they will have all the sanctions removed. That’s a terrible deal. It would keep Iran as a threshold nation that is capable of crossing the nuclear threshold at the time of their choosing within weeks or months. That would endanger the entire world. It would endanger you.

They’re developing intercontinental ballistic missiles to put nuclear bombs on those missiles for you. Don’t let it happen.

CROWLEY: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, thank you for your time this morning.

Source: CNN

 

Tony Kan: Passover and Slavery

PassoverPlateIn April 2014, Tony Kan gave an address on Pesach (Passover).  In his address, he gave a summary of the traditional Passover Seder, and discussed some major themes that arise from the material.  In particular he focused on the themes of Jewish identity and Freedom from Slavery.

His discussion of Jewish Identity covered the complex issues which arise when this topic arises as it is not just a question of race, but faith and other issues.

Freedom from slavery is a marquee theme of Passover and he discusses the biblical basis for why this injustice should be fought by all believers.  Kan also gives survey of Modern Slavery and gives evidence of its presence in modern New Zealand.

The compressed PowerPoint presentation with embedded notes may be downloaded from here.