Congress overwhelming passes resolution condemning global boycott targeting Israel | Washington Post

The House [Congress] on Tuesday overwhelmingly passed a measure condemning efforts to boycott and economically isolate Israel over its policies toward Palestinians, an explosive global issue that exposed fissures inside the Democratic ranks.

The 398-to-17 vote comes after months of turmoil centering on Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), two Muslim freshmen who have stood accused of anti-Semitism over public remarks they have made referencing Israel and the Holocaust.

The congresswomen, repeatedly singled out by President Trump in the past week, opposed the resolution, arguing that it infringes on free speech and the right to participate in boycotts for human and civil rights.

Trump renewed his attacks on Omar on Tuesday, calling her an “America hating anti-Semite” in a tweet. Omar apologized in February after suggesting that Israel’s American supporters were motivated by money.

The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, or BDS, calls on the international community to withdraw investments and shun the Israeli government, businesses and other institutions to win greater rights for Palestinians living in disputed territories. Its critics argue that its goals would fundamentally undermine Israel’s status as a Jewish homeland.

“You want to criticize the government? That’s your right. You want to stop buying products from a certain country? That’s also your right,” said House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot L. Engel (D-N.Y.). “But participating in an international commercial effort that undermines Israel’s legitimacy and scuttles the chances of a two-state solution isn’t the same as an individual exercising First Amendment rights.”

Engel said of the BDS movement: “It’s a fraud. It’s Israel-hating. It’s Jew-hating. We’ve had enough of that in the world.”

Read more

Is Jesus Good for the Jews? | Wall St Journal

NZFOI: A particularly relevant and timely piece, after Golriz Ghahraman’s recent allegations that Jesus was a “Palestinian refugee.”

Was Jesus a Jew? The idea shouldn’t be controversial. Yet there have been plenty of attempts to challenge his connection to Judaism. Dissociating Jesus from his Jewishness has a dark history that continues to poison discourse today.

In the early 20th century, the anti-Semitic and racist German-British philosopher Houston Stewart Chamberlain argued that while Judaism provided the religious background for Jesus, he “had not a drop of genuinely Jewish blood in his veins.” The Nazis picked up on this thread. As Hitler consolidated power, German theologians insisted that Jesus was not a Jew but an Aryan, descended from Galilean gentiles.

In the context of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has sought to sever Jesus’ religion from his nationality or ethnicity. In a 2014 Christmas message, Mr. Abbas called Jesus “a Palestinian messenger of love, justice and peace.” This remains a common refrain from anti-Israel activists.

Sometimes this rhetoric is aimed at erasing Judaism from the religious and moral history of Western civilization. Other times it’s an attempt to undercut Jewish appeals to a uniquely ancient relationship with the land of Israel. Either way, these objections place Jews in a complicated position.

Read more

Hamas political bureau member Fathi Hammad said in a Friday speech at a “March of Return” rally that aired on Al-Aqsa TV (Hamas-Gaza) that Israel has until this Friday (July 19) to lift the siege on the Gaza Strip and implement its understandings with Hamas, lest the Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank and all over the world use the “many methods and means” that are “up their sleeves” to “powerfully explode” in Israel’s face. He said that contrary to what Israel thinks, Gazans are not rational, and that if they die they will do so honorably while cutting off the heads of Jews and killing them with explosive belts, which he said Hamas has been actively manufacturing. Calling on the 7 million Palestinians abroad, whom he said have been “warming up” and “preparing,” Hammad said: “Enough warming up. … We must attack every Jew on planet Earth and slaughter and kill them.” | JNS

Fathi Hammad

Hamas political bureau member Fathi Hammad said in a Friday speech at a “March of Return” rally that aired on Al-Aqsa TV (Hamas-Gaza) that Israel has until this Friday (July 19) to lift the siege on the Gaza Strip and implement its understandings with Hamas, lest the Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank and all over the world use the “many methods and means” that are “up their sleeves” to “powerfully explode” in Israel’s face.

He said that contrary to what Israel thinks, Gazans are not rational, and that if they die they will do so honorably while cutting off the heads of Jews and killing them with explosive belts, which he said Hamas has been actively manufacturing.

Calling on the 7 million Palestinians abroad, whom he said have been “warming up”  and “preparing,” Hammad said: “Enough warming up. … We must attack every Jew on planet Earth and slaughter and kill them.”

Hammad said: “Enough warming up… We must attack every Jew on planet Earth and slaughter and kill them.” Hammad also encouraged Palestinians in the West Bank to purchase knives in order to cut the necks of Jews, saying that knives only cost five shekels. He added: “We will die while exploding and cutting the necks and legs of the Jews. We will lacerate them and tear them to pieces, Allah willing!”

Read more

Liquid Knowledge: On Israel and Palestine | Salient

Victoria University of Wellington

NZFOI: Here, Caitlin Hicks has produced a potted history of the Middle Eastern conflict for readers of the Victoria University of Wellington weekly student paper, the Salient. The self-described “objective” history omits some key data. These omissions will inevitably skew the naïve reader toward concluding that Israel is the “bad guy” and is inflicting an injustice on the “Palestinian” good guys. Can you spot the omissions?

IsraelPalestine

This week’s column returns to its roots in attempting to simplify the trickiest of global issues. This week, I’ve attempted to summarise what has been described as the most “intractable” conflict in history. Two pages barely scratch the surface of a heavy issue, but in any case, I’ve departed from my typical jovial tone to deliver an objective and (very!) brief outline.

Two Groups, One Land

Although ‘Palestinian’ encompasses anyone with roots in the land now referred to as Israel, it is commonly used to reference Arabs. Israelis are predominantly Jewish.

The Israeli–Palestinian conflict as we know it today began in the early 20th century. At its core are two groups who lay claim to the same land. Jews, fleeing persecution in Europe, hoped to establish a homeland in what was then a British-controlled territory. This territory wasn’t a country, but an area called ‘Palestine’, occupied by Arabs and Jews: both hoped to claim the land as their own state.

Jews occupying and immigrating into this territory considered it a return to their ancestral homeland, and hoped to establish an independent Jewish state. Palestinians resisted, claiming the land as rightfully theirs, asserting that it was a state by the name Palestine. In 1947, the UN attempted to avoid disputes by apportioning the land to both, but this failed and lead to conflict—the consequences of which still linger.

1948 Israeli War of Independence

In 1948, Israel was declared an independent state by the Jewish Authority. This began an Arab–Israeli struggle rendering 700,000 Palestinian civilians refugees. By the end of the war, Israelis possessed 77% of the disputed territory. Each side views the events of 1948 differently—Palestinians recount a premeditated Israeli ethnic cleansing campaign against Arabs, and Israelis claim that the mass exodus was owed to spontaneous Arab fleeing, exacerbated by collateral wartime tragedies. Today, over seven million Palestinians (those originally displaced and their descendants) remain uprooted. A Palestinian right to return remains a critical condition of any future settlement.

Read more

The tragedy of the Palestinian Diaspora | The Independent

NZFOI: not much has changed since 2009.

It is a cynical but time-honoured practice in Middle Eastern politics: the statesmen who decry the political and humanitarian crisis of the approximately 3.9 million Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank and in Gaza ignore the plight of an estimated 4.6 million Palestinians who live in Arab countries.

For decades, Arab governments have justified their decision to maintain millions of stateless Palestinians as refugees in squalid camps as a means of applying pressure to Israel.

Read more

DOCEDGE FESTIVAL: “GAZA”: A REVIEW

 – A slanted take on life there

You would have thought that the collaboration between a Northern Irishman and his Republican counterpart (Garry Keane and Andrew McConnell) would yield a truthful insight into Gaza, that tiny 40km by 11km strip. They, after all, know what it’s like to come from different sides of a conflict, the importance of showing life accurately and should well know how “The Troubles” ended. Alas no. The documentary brief as outlined in the Doc Edge festival, was to show real life in Gaza, not just shapshots of war. In that they do in part, but without crucial explanation of key elements and all set to a very emotive score. It’s a story that began when Andrew McConnell went to Gaza to photograph surfers, so the sea plays a key role.

What we see is a collection of vignettes on the lives of different inhabitants and events that happen. The cast of characters is extremely varied with a great deal of emphasis on children who roam about and the role of the sea in their varied lives. We meet a taxi driver, a fisherman, a frustrated tailor, a man with three wives and 40 children, a theatre director, a vain lifeguard, a wealthy family with a sensitive child, a handicapped rapper, a paramedic et al. Thematically the documentary explores how people cope, living in what former British PM David Cameron described as an “open air prison” with unemployment standing at 50%, only 4-5 hours of power a day and undrinkable water.

What makes this documentary poignant is the UN has declared Gaza uninhabitable by 2020 – well that’s next year. Many watching this documentary will miss the points being shown; especially as it ends with a targeted Israeli attack and the consequent injuries and destroyed buildings invalidating the stated purpose. Meantime here are some questions unanswered:

  1. Why is there no reference to the impact of the Eqyptian border closure?
  2. Why does Israel get the blame for this situation not of their making? They withdrew.
  3. Why is there a refugee camp in Gaza, aren’t they all the same people?
  4. Where is the money coming from for food and supplies if there is no work?
  5. Why are women wearing the Hijab when they didn’t previously?
  6. Why aren’t some of the children going to school?
  7. Why only 4-5 hours of power?
  8. Who is responsible for fixing the utilities?
  9. Why does Hamas engage in indiscriminate shooting in the streets?
  10. Why are they handing out sweets to the crowds after the prisoner is released?
  11. Rubbish is everywhere. Yet people are sitting around playing cards, not cleaning up things? Don’t they care for their country? Is it someone else’s responsibility?
  12. Why are there posters of Yasser Arafat?
  13. Why aren’t bombed buildings fixed so people can go and live there. Isn’t that why they need concrete and building materials, so where is it going? Tunnels perhaps?
  14. Are all fishermen innocent people just catching fish?
  15. Why are they burning tyres and harming their health on the Israeli border alone?

By ending with an Israeli bombing and its aftermath, the documentary can only lead you to blame Israel for all Gazan woes.  Clearly, misleading.

About the Author:  Joanna Moss is a writer, researcher and the NZFOI Wellington Regional Coordinator.

Minister apologises to Israel over dodgy map | NZ Herald

NZ Minister of Immigration, Iain Lees-Galloway

The Immigration Minister has apologised to Israel’s ambassador after an Immigration New Zealand map caused a diplomatic incident by appearing to label Israel “Palestine”.

Israel’s Ambassador to New Zealand, Itzhak Gerberg, was left offended this week by an online INZ fact sheet about Palestinian refugees he said “completely ignored” his country and used pre-1967 borders to depict the region.

“This official paper of New Zealand incites hatred of the State of Israel as well as anti-Semitism,” he wrote to Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway, describing the accompanying language as “abusive”.

In a reply posted by the ambassador, Lees-Galloway apologised for offence caused and said immediate action had been to take the diagram down.

“I can assure you the fact sheet did not reflect New Zealand Government policy and has been removed,” he wrote.

“The map was clearly inaccurate and did not label the State of Israel as it should.”

Foreign Minister Winston Peters on Thursday described the incident as a “rather careless and shoddy mistake”.

“The way it was handled was an affront to the Israeli people … It started out from innocence,” Peters told a Parliamentary Select Committee.

Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters has described the map as a
Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters has described the map as a “careless and shoddy mistake”. Photo / Mark Mitchell
He later told reporters a minister-to-minister apology could also be in order.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs secretary Chris Seed added a new procedure to check maps would be taken up.

“It was a human error. There was nothing untoward about it, so we are trying to understand where the map itself came from,” he said.

Israel Institute of New Zealand director Ashley Church this week called for an investigation.

“The most immediately obvious of the errors was a map labelling the whole of modern-day Israel as ‘Palestine’,” he said.

“This is incredibly offensive and the equivalent of New Zealand Immigration displaying a map of the United Kingdom which removed Scotland and Wales and referred to the entirety of the British Isles as England.”

An INZ spokeswoman said the document was meant to give additional information about the humanitarian situation in Palestine and New Zealand’s refugee programme.

New Zealand has long supported a two-state solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

Tensions between New Zealand and Israel soured in 2016, when New Zealand co-sponsored a United Nations Security Council resolution in 2016 condemning Israel over continued settlement of the West Bank – a resolution the Labour Party supported but New Zealand First did not.

Israeli’s ambassador was recalled for about six months during the stoush.

Source

No, Israel isn’t a country of privileged and powerful white Europeans | LA Times

Mizrahi Jews

Along with resurgent identity politics in the United States and Europe, there is a growing inclination to frame the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in terms of race. According to this narrative, Israel was established as a refuge for oppressed white European Jews who in turn became oppressors of people of color, the Palestinians.

As an Israeli, and the son of an Iraqi Jewish mother and North African Jewish father, it’s gut-wrenching to witness this shift.

I am Mizrahi, as are the majority of Jews in Israel today. We are of Middle Eastern and North African descent. Only about 30% of Israeli Jews are Ashkenazi, or the descendants of European Jews. I am baffled as to why mainstream media and politicians around the world ignore or misrepresent these facts and the Mizrahi story. Perhaps it’s because our history shatters a stereotype about the identity of my country and my people.

Jews that were expelled from nations across the Middle East have been crucial in building and defending the Jewish state since its outset.

Israel, the world’s only Jewish state, was not established for just one type of Jew but for all Jews, from every part of the world — the Middle East, North Africa, Ethiopia, Asia and, yes, Europe. No matter where Jews physically reside, they maintain a connection to the land of Israel, where our story started and where today we continue to craft it.

The likes of Women’s March activist Tamika Mallory, Temple University professor Marc Lamont Hill and, more recently, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) falsify reality in their discussions of Palestinians’ “intersectional” struggle, their use of the term “apartheid” to characterize Israeli policy, and their tendency to define Israelis as Ashkenazi Jews alone.

Read more

Rashida Tlaib Has Her History Wrong |The Atlantic

U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) listens during a House Oversight and Government Reform hearing on the “Trump Administration’s Response to the Drug Crisis-Part II” on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 9, 2019. REUTERS/Leah Millis

Many people, Rashida Tlaib, believe the myth that the Palestinian Arab unfairly paid the price for providing a safe haven for Jews after the Holocaust.  In fact, Benny Morris sets out the case that the Palestinians also had a hand in promoting, aiding and abetting the Nazi’s Solution.  

On Friday, Representative Rashida Tlaib was attacked by President Donald Trump for a “horrible and highly insensitive statement on the Holocaust” and for having “tremendous hatred of … the Jewish people.” Trump’s off-base attack distracted from the actual problems with Tlaib’s account of the Arab-Israeli conflict, in which she deployed deliberately imprecise language, misleading her listeners about the early history of the conflict in Palestine and misrepresenting its present and possible future.
Tlaib told the hosts of the Yahoo News podcast Skullduggery that when she remembers the Holocaust, it has a “calming” effect on her to think that “it was my ancestors, Palestinians, who lost their land, and some lost their lives, their livelihood, their human dignity; their existence in some ways had been wiped out … all of it was in the name of trying to create a safe haven for Jews, post the Holocaust, post the tragedy and horrific persecution of Jews across the world at that time.” She was, she said, “humbled by the fact that it was [my Palestinian] ancestors that had to suffer for that to happen.”
But the historical reality was quite different from what Tlaib described: The Palestinians indirectly, and in some ways directly, aided in the destruction of European Jewry.

Read more

Arab-Israeli Conflict Islamic Jihad admits baby, pregnant woman killed by their own rockets | Jerusalem Post

The Islamic Jihad, one of the terror organisations responsible for the recent wave of attacks against Israel, admitted that the baby was killed in Gaza during the latest escalation died as a result of a misfired rocket, TPS reported on Monday.

“A leak from the heroes of the [Islamic Jihad’s] Sarayat al-Quds (Jerusalem Brigades) on the circumstances of the death of the baby Saba Abu ‘Arar indicates that a rocket of the resistance exploded inside the family’s home due to a technical failure, and prematurely exploded,” a news item by Hamas’ al-Risala News said.

Read more