Rights group: Israeli banks help with settlement building | NZ Herald

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israeli banks are helping build West Bank settlements in violation of international law by providing financial services to home buyers and local councils, Human Rights Watch said in a new report published Tuesday.

The report said that bank activities in or with settlements have helped encourage settlement growth and “contribute to rights abuses” against Palestinians. It added that Israeli banks, and international banks doing business with them, may be engaging in pillage, by acquiring ownership interests in housing projects on seized land.

Because of an Israeli law limiting the amount of money developers can collect from buyers in advance, banks often become direct partners in settlement projects, Human Rights Watch says.

Read more

The Jews who helped cure Nazis | The Jewish Chronicle

Walter Merkel and his twin brother

The remarkable tale of three Jewish army officers who used kindness and care to rehabilitate their former SS enemies

The letter was addressed to “Captain W Merkel, Featherstone Park Camp, Northumberland” and dated October 14, 1946.

Featherstone Park was a prisoner of war (PoW) camp. The letter’s author, Kurt Schilling, was a former Nazi officer who had just been released from the camp and returned to Germany.

“I cannot but thank you for all the kindness and humane understanding you showed, not only to myself, but also to the other PoWs in ‘C’ compound,” he wrote to Captain Walter Merkel.

“I myself am grateful to you and those officers like you who made my unpleasant duty much easier by their excellent understanding of the mentality of prisoners of war.

“Most of those British officers under the command of Colonel Vickers have done more for understanding between our two nations, by the way of treatment in the camp, than statesmanship can ever hope to achieve.”

Featherstone was one of a number of PoW camps operated in Britain to rehabilitate German soldiers, including many devoted Nazis.

What made it different from any other camp was that its key officers — Colonel Vickers, Cpt Merkel and a Captain Herbert Sulzbach — were all Jewish.

Robert Bieber, a visiting research fellow at the department of war studies at Kings College, London, came across the story via his wife’s work at Richmond Synagogue.

He explained: “My wife runs a day centre at the shul for elderly people, and one of the ladies who’s a member came to me and said: ‘I’ve got some very interesting papers. My first husband was in the army, and I thought you’d like to see them’.”

Drawings and Christmas cards were among the gifts the former senior Nazis made and presented to their Jewish PoW camp guards.
Drawings and Christmas cards were among the gifts the former senior Nazis made and presented to their Jewish PoW camp guards.

The papers contained thank-you letters to Cpt Merkel, as well as other items that the German PoWs had made to show their gratitude towards him, including a specially designed Christmas card, and a book full of expertly drawn cartoons depicting life at Featherstone and Cpt Merkel’s role at the camp.

The portfolio of letters and drawings was acquired by the Imperial War Museum earlier this month, with the collection described as “unique and visually arresting”.

“Herbert Sulzbach wrote a book. His role was reconciliation,” Mr Bieber said.

Cpt Sulzbach, a British officer in World War Two, had been a German Officer in World War One, winning the Iron Cross first and second class for bravery.

He would go on to be awarded with both an OBE and the Croix de Guerre, possibly giving him a unique collection of medals. He also received letters from grateful prisoners, including members of the SS.

One wrote of Cpt Sulzbach’s rehabilitation efforts: “We were all the more astonished that you did not exclude us members of the SS, who should inevitably have been your enemies to the death.”

Another, an SS Standartenfuhrer, wrote to the captain saying simply: “You have cured me of certain preconceptions.”

Mr Bieber said: “Cpt Merkel’s role has been far less recognised. But it’s recognised here in terms of the artefacts. The Imperial War Museum want to make these particular items a centre-piece of their new World War Two exhibition.”

Featherstone Park prisoner of war camp in Northumberland in 1947. It was used for the de-Nazification of former SS officers
Featherstone Park prisoner of war camp in Northumberland in 1947. It was used for the de-Nazification of former SS officers

Mr Bieber described the relationship between Cpt Merkel and the Nazi officers as a “remarkable rapport”.

“They never suppressed the fact that they were Jewish. Cpt Merkel, in conjunction with Cpt Sulzbach and Col Vickers — all three of them were Jewish — built a remarkable system.”

Despite his surname, Cpt Merkel was born to a British family, in Newcastle.

“He was one of six, an identical twin,” his daughter Karen said. “When the depression came, the whole family moved from Tyneside to London.

“My father left school when he was 14. He and his twin joined the Jewish Lads Brigade in London and also the Territorial Army. They were keen to serve. He joined the Durham Light Infantry, but was ill and in hospital having an operation when they went off to Burma and never came back, so it was extraordinary that he survived, like a flip of the coin.

“He was then posted back up to Northumberland to serve at the prisoner of war camp for senior Nazis.”

Cpt Merkel met and married his wife while an officer at the camp.

“It was extraordinary that he found himself one of three senior officers, all of whom were Jewish,” his daughter said.

“I don’t know what the odds are of that, but it does seem quite extraordinary that they were there, looking after senior Nazi officers.

“They got on. Obviously it was their job to encourage the officers to think differently. They were there to encourage new ways of approaching life and thinking.

“We have some really stunning items in the family which the prisoners made for my father. We have a clock, candlestick holders, the most beautiful big bookcase, an ashtray, jewellery boxes, and the most amazing box for my mother when they got engaged.

“There was a huge affection.”

The three British officers at Featherstone were not the only ones who worked in camps designed to aid in the de-Nazification of German soldiers.

Capt Herbert Sulzbach (centre) was filmed with Englebert Hoppe and Kurt Schwedersky in 1982 when a memorial plaque was erected at the gates of Featherstone Park. Capt Sulzbach served in the German army in 1914
Capt Herbert Sulzbach (centre) was filmed with Englebert Hoppe and Kurt Schwedersky in 1982 when a memorial plaque was erected at the gates of Featherstone Park. Capt Sulzbach served in the German army in 1914

An article written by Dr Anthony Grenville for the journal of the Association of Jewish Refugees, in memory of Cpt Sulzbach, noted an incident recounted by a former German prisoner at Camp 180, near Cambridge.

An SS officer at the camp shouted “Jew lout” at Charles Stambrook, a British Jewish officer, as the prisoners were being counted.

“Let us reflect for a moment what an SS officer would have done, if a prisoner of war had shouted ‘SS lout’ at him,” the prisoner said.

“This is what the British officer did. He turned round cooly and said calmly to the man who had shouted: ‘The Jew part is correct, the lout part isn’t’. And carried on.”

Mr Bieber said he “couldn’t imagine what came over the British authorities, to put three British Jewish officers in charge of a Nazi prisoner of war camp.

“I had a sense of almost disbelief to read about it in the first place, but then a sense of ‘isn’t this what Jewish people stand for? Reaching out the hands of friendship?’. This is exactly what Jewish people do. So I felt a huge sense of pride and belief, justifying my confidence in what we Jews are.”

Source

U.S. Statement at the HRC Special Session on Gaza | US Govt

Theodore Allegra

HRC 28th Special Session
As prepared for delivery by Theodore Allegra, Chargé d’Affaires,
U.S. Mission to the United Nations in Geneva

Geneva, May 18, 2018

Mr. President,

The United States remains concerned over the recent outbreak of violence along the Gaza fence.  But today’s session is blatantly taking sides and ignoring the real culprit for the recent outbreak of violence, the terrorist organization Hamas.  Hamas has even admitted its involvement in the violence when a Hamas official proudly announced that 50 of the 62 killed were members of Hamas.

The United States affirms Israel’s right to defend itself.  We also condemn in the strongest terms actions by Hamas and other militant groups.

The recent outbreak of violence is part of a broader pattern of incitement to violence perpetrated by Hamas and its partners.  In recent days, multiple news organizations have documented the Hamas incitement in Gaza.  They have reported that Hamas maps and social media show the fastest routes to reach Israeli communities in case demonstrators make it through the security fence.  They have reported on Hamas messages over loudspeakers that urge demonstrators to burst through the fence, falsely claiming Israeli soldiers were fleeing, when in fact, they were not.  The same loudspeakers are used by Hamas to urge the crowds to “Get closer! Get closer!” to the security fence.

Hamas allegedly encouraged demonstrators to attack the Kerem Shalom crossing, the biggest entry point in Gaza for fuel, food, and medical supplies.  They have sent burning kites adorned with swastikas across the fence, and taken other actions that place civilians’ lives in jeopardy.  This is the real story of what is happening in Gaza, and it is clear that Hamas is to blame for the outbreak of violence.

Read more

Israeli Supreme Court rejects challenge to open-fire rules | NZ Herald

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel’s Supreme Court on Thursday rejected a legal challenge to the military’s rules on when soldiers can fire their weapons amid weeks of violent protests that have killed dozens of Palestinians on the border with Gaza.

Six human rights groups had asked the court to declare as unlawful any regulations that allow soldiers to open fire at unarmed civilians.

But in its unanimous ruling, the court sided with the Israeli military, which argued that the protests were taking place in the context of a long-running armed conflict with the Islamic militant group Hamas which rules Gaza and that weapons-use regulations are subject to the rules of armed conflict. Such rules provide greater leeway for the use of lethal force than those governing law enforcement practices.

Read more

Holocaust survivor reveals how he was beaten and starved at Nazi camps | NZ Herald

As a young child in Nazi-occupied Poland in 1939, Szmulek Rozental (Steve Ross) was terrified when he heard the rumbling sound of trucks bringing in 20 soldiers in yellow uniforms sitting with rifles between their knees.

They stopped, spread blankets on the ground, and with the help of local policemen, demanded all valuables be surrendered and placed on the blankets.

The soldiers set the beards and collars of the Hassidic men on fire engulfing their faces in flames, threw one woman in a chair out of a window and used a lock cutter to cut off a man’s nose, according to the Daily Mail.

Read more

Palestinian plea to ICC could speed up war crime probe | NZ Herald

JERUSALEM (AP) — The Palestinians on Tuesday asked the International Criminal Court to open an immediate investigation into Israeli practices in the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza Strip — setting off a process that they hope will culminate with war crimes accusations against Israeli leaders.

The step drew Israeli condemnation and worsened already poor relations between the sides.

The step, known as a state party referral, seeks an investigation into Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, as well as Israeli military activity in the Gaza Strip, including the recent killing of dozens of Palestinians during mass protests along the border. The Palestinians seek all three areas, captured by Israel in 1967, for a future independent state.

Here is a closer look at the Palestinian move and its implications.

Read more

Rob Berg: Israel right to defend itself against Hamas terrorist attack in Gaza | NZ Herald

Rob Berg, President of the Zionist Federation of New Zealand

Despite the many conflicts around the world, there seems to be few as emotive, and that garner as much attention, as the Israeli-Palestinian one. And whenever there is a flare up, we see a rush to judgment against Israel before the full facts are known, an uncritical embrace of the Palestinian narrative, and a disregard for context and analysis.

This has been evident once again since the Palestinian Arabs in Gaza embarked over 6 weeks ago on their “Great March of Return”, a so-called peaceful march which last Monday resulted in the deaths of 62 of their number. Israel was condemned around much of the world, the Ambassador of Israel to New Zealand called into the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and, linking it to the move of the US Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, the Prime Minister commented on “the devastating, one-sided loss of life”. She didn’t say how many Israeli deaths would have prevented her recrimination.

Read more

John Roughan: A little more Israeli respect for Islam might go a long way | NZ Herald

John Roughan

What’s the matter with Israel? Why, when you live in the heart of the Islamic world, would you encourage America’s irresponsible idiot to move its embassy to Jerusalem? Why risk the utterly predictable response and then have your guards open fire on protesters at the Gaza border?

What a way to mark your 70th anniversary. It served only to remind the rest of the world how long we have lived with this festering sore.

Seventy years ago Stalin was running the Soviet Union, the Cold War was just beginning, other long running troubles of the 20th century, apartheid and Northern Ireland, had yet to appear. All those problems seemed intractable until suddenly, they were not. As the century drew to a close, good leadership settled them. Only the Arab-Israeli conflict has persisted into the 21st century with no end in sight.

In fact, this century it has got worse. On one side, Israel has built walls and checkpoints against the Palestinians it has driven from their homes in the occupied territories. On the other, Islam has been infected by a fundamentalist revival that has forced women back into headscarves and at its extremes, generated the terrorism that haunts the world in the new century.

Read more

Gaza and the fallacy of moral equivalence | Algemeiner

Layla Ghandour’s body in her grandmother’s arms

Rarely does the photo, four columns wide, of a dead baby appear on page one of The New York Times as it did on May 17. The sorrowful death of Layla Ghandour became, for the Times, “fodder for competing narratives.” But, in fact, a dead Palestinian baby is grist for a newspaper eager to blame Israel first.

The accompanying article was written by Times Cairo bureau chief Declan Walsh. He told the poignant story of an eight-month-old Gaza girl with sparkling eyes that he actually never saw. Held “in the arms of her grandmother when a cloud of tear gas engulfed them” at Monday’s Gaza protest, when 50-plus Palestinians were killed as they attempted to breach the border with Israel, Layla supposedly inhaled “acrid gas.” Dying several hours later, her story “shot across the globe, providing an emotive focus for outrage” not directed at the politically zealous family members who brought her there but, predictably, at Israel.

Layla’s photo was taken by Gaza photographer Mahmud Hams, who described his specialty as “shots of children crushed in the rubble. Parents weeping beside lifeless little bodies. Death. Destruction. Funerals of men, women, children, sometimes very young children.” It is, by implication, always Israel’s fault. Walsh describes “the pressures of life” in Gaza under “an Israeli blockade” that contributed to Layla’s death.

But he inadvertently describes a family’s tragic, zealous dysfunction. Layla was dozing at home when the call sounded from a nearby mosque that a bus awaited passengers heading to the Gaza border fence. Her 12-year-old uncle, assuming that her mother was already on board, took Layla with him. Later that afternoon, when she began to cry, the boy carried her toward the border to find her grandmother, who was busy shouting at Israelis across the fence. Tear gas fell nearby, an hour later Layla died.

In Gaza, Walsh notes, “the rules of grief” transform private suffering, to say nothing of family history, into a political frenzy. An uncle who belonged to the terrorist Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, died fighting Israelis soldiers. Another uncle died while throwing stones at them. The day after Layla died her father marched to Hamas’s fiery tune, carrying her body wrapped in a Palestinian flag while leading a crowd chanting slogans about “Israeli blood lust.” Layla’s death parade, Walsh notes, was designed to win “international sympathy.” And the Times took the bait.

Read more

US demands wholesale changes in Iran policies post-nuke deal | NZ Herald

Mike Pompeo, US Secretary of State

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration on Monday demanded that Iran make wholesale changes in its military and regional policies or face “the strongest sanctions in history,” as it sought to turn up heat on Tehran after President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from a landmark nuclear deal.

In speech that called Iran out for a wide range of “malign activities” apart from its nuclear program, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called for the negotiation of a new deal that would go far beyond the single focus of the 2015 agreement and would have the status of a formal treaty. The 2015 deal concluded under the Obama administration dealt only with the nuclear program and was not a treaty but rather a U.N.-endorsed executive agreement between the parties.

Unless such a treaty can be reached, Pompeo warned that Iran would face tough sanctions that would leave it “battling to keep its economy alive.” But he laid out no strategy for convincing Iran, the other participants in the original deal — Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the European Union — or others to open such a negotiation.

“These will end up being the strongest sanctions in history by the time we are complete,” Pompeo said at the conservative Heritage Foundation in his first major policy speech since taking over as top diplomat.

Read more