How Bob and Freda Narev fled the Holocaust and became honoured Kiwis | The Listener

Bob and Freyda Narev

Commemorations around the world have marked the 75th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. An Auckland couple who survived the Holocaust are contributing to a global effort aimed at ensuring “never again” means just that.

The Theresienstadt concentration camp, near Prague, was presented to the world as an idyllic thermal spa, Hitler’s “gift to the Jews”.
 
Hitler’s propaganda machine ensured that the camp, established in an old stone-fortress town, received favourable coverage in German newspapers.
 
A movie, produced in 1940, showed happy and well-fed settlers. When the Red Cross visited in 1944, a few select parts of the camp had been given a fresh coat of paint, and thousands of Jews had been sent to Auschwitz so it appeared less crowded.
 
The deceit worked and the Red Cross provided a favourable report. Thousands perished at the camp from disease and malnutrition, but Bob Narev, prisoner XII/1 618, lived to tell his and his mother’s story of survival. Narev still has the Star of David that he was forced, under threat of death, to wear at all times.
 

In New Zealand we need to recall our own links to the Holocaust | Spinoff

The crew of Armando Diaz, other fascists and the RSA rallying at Wellington’s cenotaph in November 1934 (Photo: PAColl-7081-16. Alexander Turnbull Library, Wellington, New Zealand. /records/23124270)

NZFOI: This article is remarkable in that it draws together evidence that there was significant sympathy for the Nazi Fascist philosophies of the 1930s. These sympathies were more widely held than the Western world would care to admit following the discovery of the death camps uncovered toward the end of WW2. Today few recall that in the early- to mid-1930s, the world was unsure as to what to make of Fascism and Communism. There were groups on both sides of the spectrum that recognized the potential for evil both these philosophies could unleash. Equally there many that thought that either one of these philosophies would bring the longed for prosperity and happiness that had eluded society for so long. But the silent majority were undecided and only saw immigrants and refugees as additional competitors for limited resources.

Last week the discovery of Nazi symbols sprayed outside a Wellington synagogue brought shock and condemnation. But New Zealand is no stranger to antisemitism. In light of increasing ignorance about the Holocaust, we need to revisit and acknowledge our history, writes Scott Hamilton.

Today is Holocaust Remembrance Day. Around the world, candles will be lit to honour the six and a quarter million Jews who died in Europe between 1933, when the Nazis took power in Germany, and 1945, when Hitler shot himself amid the ruins of Berlin. Last year a poll found that 29% of New Zealanders knew little or nothing about the Holocaust. When they were asked whether the Holocaust was a myth, a third of those polled either refused to respond or said they were unsure how to answer. Only 18% of young New Zealanders said they knew much about the Holocaust.

Giacomo Lichtner, an associate professor of history at Victoria University, wrote an op-ed on Stuff to explain why he was unsurprised by the findings of the poll. When he has tried to talk to New Zealanders about the Holocaust, Lichtner has often found Kiwis sceptical about the event’s relevance to their country. What, they wonder, could faraway New Zealand have had to do with the tragedy of the Jews in fascist Europe?

Read more

Richard Dimbleby’s 1945 BBC Report describing Bergen-Belsen Camp

This is the report mentioned in David Zwartz’s article “Why Holocaust Remembrance Day matters more than ever” published by Stuff, two days ago.

Qassem Suleimani’s Career of Trying to Kill Jews | Mosaic

Suleimani’s funeral procession

At the funeral of the Iranian general Qassem Suleimani, one of the few non-family members to deliver a eulogy was the Hamas chairman Ismail Haniyeh—a reminder that the elite Quds Force, which Suleimani commanded for over two decades, invested much in coordinating terrorist attacks against Israel. And not only against Israel, writes Yehudit Barsky, but against Jews wherever they might be found

Read more

Why you should know San Remo | IFF

League of Nations Delegates who attended the San Remo Conference, April 1920

Many people know the Balfour Declaration of Nov. 2, 1917 and the U.N. Vote on the Partition Plan on Nov. 29, 1947 as the two main international political events that led to Israel’s Declaration of Independence on May 14, 1948.

On December 11, 1917, which was the eve of Hanukkah, General Allenby led the British troops into Jerusalem. Allenby was hailed as the savior of the Jews, especially in light of the fact that one month earlier Britain had issued the Balfour Declaration.

However, there is a misconception that the Balfour Declaration was just a letter of intent, and not a binding legal document. The reason for this misconception is that most people are not aware of the San Remo Conference which took place on April 19, 1920, lasted for seven days and published its resolutions on April 25, 1920. These seven days laid the political foundation for the creation of the 22 Arab League States and the one and only Jewish State of Israel.

The full text of the Balfour Declaration became an integral part of the San Remo resolution and the British Mandate for Palestine, thereby transforming it from a letter of intent into a legally-binding foundational document under international law.

Did the Arabs oppose the creation of a Jewish State at San Remo? The answer is a resounding NO!

Emir Feisal and Chaim Weizmann, 1918.
Dr Chaim Weizmann (left) and Emir Faisal of Iraq

At that time they were focused on the creation of independent Arab states and had no objection to the establishment of a tiny Jewish state in Palestine. This was formalized in the Weizmann-Feisal agreement which led to the League of Nations recognizing the Land of Israel (then Palestine) as the homeland of the Jewish people.

Read more

The Myth of the Thirsty Palestinian | The Tower

The latest line of anti-Israel attack claims the Jewish state withholds water from the Palestinians. As usual, the haters have their facts wrong.

The issue of water rights in the West Bank is constantly raised in regard to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, appearing again and again in public discourse around the world. According to critics of Israel, the Jewish state selfishly exploits the area’s water supplies and denies access to the local population. In doing so, the critics say, Israel is not only abandoning its responsibilities to the West Bank Palestinians, but ruthlessly and illegally abusing the natural resources of the occupied territory. This idea has become extremely widespread in the international media, and was recently voiced from the Knesset plenum by the President of the European Parliament, Martin Schulz, causing a minor scandal in Israel and abroad.

As with all attacks on Israel, the truth is much more complicated and, to a great extent, precisely the opposite of what the critics claim. When one examines the relevant data, it becomes clear that, under Israeli rule, the Palestinian water supply has become larger, more technologically sophisticated, of higher quality, and much easier to access; almost entirely due to Israeli efforts.

Read more

Lone Soldier | Mishpacha

Youssef Haddad

Youssef Haddad is an Israeli Arab from Nazareth, he is the son of a Christian-Arab minister, and he has dedicated his life to defending Israel’s reputation on the world stage.

At 34, he’s in much demand among journalists in Israel and on news networks around the world.

After all, an Arab who’s become a champion of Israel, even as a good number of Israelis themselves are not shy about condemning their own country’s policies as they ally with avowed enemies, is newsworthy.

Read more

Being Jewish in New Zealand and the concerning rise of antisemitism | North & South

Juliet Moses

Growing up in Auckland, I knew I was a bit different.

Christmas wasn’t a big deal for me. My family didn’t have a Christmas tree and a wreath on our door, and 25 December was the most boring day of the year. Often, we would travel to a holiday destination on that day. Once, we excitedly discovered the movies were on, and had pretty much the entire theatre to ourselves.

Around Easter, my customary school lunchbox sandwiches got replaced with thin, dry tasteless crackers that my friends would ask to try, but only once.

On Sunday mornings, I begrudgingly went to a special school – listening to Bad Jelly the Witch on the radio as we carpooled there – where I learned a script we read from right to left. Sometimes I would use words I thought were part of every family’s lexicon, but when I was greeted with blank stares I realised they were Yiddish. When the subject of World War II came up, or what was happening in the world, I often sensed a raw and bitter pain in my grandmother.

Yes, I knew I was a bit different, but I was proud to be Jewish. My family, although not religious, was observant. I had a bat mitzvah (a coming-of-age ceremony) when I turned 13. Some of the highlights of the year for me were the Jewish festivals, when we took a day off school to attend synagogue and gather together with close family friends for a ceremonial dinner that included much rowdiness and hilarity.

Read more

Cumin v Minto public debate: recording available

On October 3, David Cumin (Israel Institute of NZ) and John Minto (Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa), met in a highly anticipated debate over Differing Perspectives of Israel. 

Held at the University of Auckland, it attracted a full house of some 170; so full that people filled the area around the podium.

Well moderated by Rosslyn Noonan, NZ’s former Human Rights Commissioner, the deep feeling of each debater’s supporters threatened to break out into chaos at times. 

Minto idealistically promoted a one-state solution where both Arab and Jew enjoyed the rights of democratic citizenship in peace. 

Cumin supported a two-state solution where both peoples could seek self-determination.  Having said that it looked like he didn’t believe this had much chance of ever succeeding as Arab leaders continue to seek a “river to the sea” solution.

The first public debate on Israel in many years, it served as a release valve for many of the pent up emotions evoked by the issue. 

Hopefully there will be further loan opportunities for public discourse, each one perhaps more focused on different aspects of the many-facted issue. 

A video recording of the event and each debater’s opening remarks may be found here.

Ask Me Anything with R Ariel Tal recordings available now

Rabbi Ariel Tal

Last September, Christchurch members were treated to an Ask Me Anything session with Rabbi Ariel Tal of the Wellington Jewish Community Centre.

An enthusiastic and engaging speaker, the crowd were quickly fascinated and intrigued with his answers to questions relating to himself, Judaism and what it is like to live as a Jew in New Zealand.

We’re pleased to announce the video recording of the event is now available. A separate audio file is also available in the same folder. Many thanks to David Allen for making the recordings.